Is the embedded Solr ( also affected by the log4j2 vulnerability?

2021-12-14 Thread clemens...@mysign.ch
Is the embedded Solr also affected by the log4j2 vulnerability? If yes: does starting the embedded Solr server ( in a tomcat ) with -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true mitigate the issue alike? Our current Solr version is 8.8.2 Thx Clemens

Re: Solr 7(.5.5) -> Solr 8(.8.2) , different non-emptyness query behavior?

2021-05-24 Thread clemens...@mysign.ch
you won't see> > : them there..> > : > > : Solr's default configSet comes with one, that includes the> > : RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory, by default unless you specify the> > : following java option: update.autoCreateFields=false> > :

Re: Solr 7(.5.5) -> Solr 8(.8.2) , different non-emptyness query behavior?

2021-05-24 Thread clemens...@mysign.ch
I'm not sure that is resulting in the change here.> > > Are you using the RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory?> > > - Houston> > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 5:58 AM clemens...@mysign.ch > > wrote:> > > > I have a unit test that tests the "non-emptyn

Solr 7(.5.5) -> Solr 8(.8.2) , different non-emptyness query behavior?

2021-05-24 Thread clemens...@mysign.ch
I have a unit test that tests the "non-emptyness query". As of updating from 7.5.5 to 8.8.2 this very test fails and returns a document that has an empty string ( i.e. "" ) The "non-emptyness query" is: fieldName:[* TO *] Has the default "behavior" of the above query changed? Does it possibly h