RE: Re: Is there a way to sort alphanumerically?

It seems to provide exactly the functionality I needed, thanks! On 2022/11/10 10:08:51 Andrew Hankinson wrote: > I use this field definition for a sort field: > > numeric="true" strength="secondary" alternate="shifted" > sortMissingLast="true" /> > > This seems to work well. > > -Andrew >

Is there a way to sort alphanumerically?

Hi all, I want to sort value alphabetically, but also numerically. Example: I want that the following items A1 B4 A2 A19 B10 Will be sorted in the following order A1 A2 A19 B2 B19 So values that start with A will appear before values that start with B, but also A2 will appear before A19, becaus

Re: Results appear to be wrongly ordered after sorting

http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ Thank you, I'll try to use string or SortableTextField, but I still don't understand why sorting on a tokenized field doesn't work as expected when all the tokens are the same except for one. Why Solr doesn't sort by this term? Netta Steinberg

Results appear to be wrongly ordered after sorting

Hello all, I have 3 indexed items. Each item has a field named TITLE_Name_t. The TITLE_ Name_t value has the same prefix for all three items, but a different suffix. The values are: THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX217330-M THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX218328-M THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX217328-M So the

Re: Unexpected results while performing a full text search with an asterisk

Thanks Stephen, I didn't know that there is no language analysis when using an asterisk. There are two things (somewhat related) that bother me: 1. as far as I know, the query parameter we send to SolR contains only the query string, without a specific field to search for, so I'm not sure which

Unexpected results while performing a full text search with an asterisk

results The only difference between the searches is the added asterisk. Anyone has an idea for why this may happen? why a search with an asterisk yields less results than a search without the asterisk? Thanks, Netta Steinberg