Thanks Anshum!!
Matt
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:19 AM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> There's an open PR to merge the code into main and subsequently release.
> This is almost ready to be merged so it might be released with the 9.8
> version.
>
> Here's the PR for you to follow - https://git
Thanks for the responses!
Shawn,
I believe I understood that Zookeeper does not actually handle the request.
Thanks for the clarification as I did not word it properly.
More precisely, will a SolrJ CloudSolrClient work for the purpose of
querying SolrCloud if the ZK host list it is configured wi
Thanks Shawn! That is helpful information.
Matt
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:26 AM Shawn Heisey
wrote:
> On 3/7/24 16:22, mtn search wrote:
> > Realized my question was not very clear. It pertains to when we bring
> the
> > primary cores back up, after X number of days, how does Solr determine to
Hey Joel,
It's been awhile! Hope you are doing well.
The feature you are proposing reminded me of the Lucidworks work I was
involved with for Lowe's Canada and how to deal with changing product
prices... Whether in or out of Solr it seems like there would be a number
of users who may benefit fr
Thanks Anshum, Dima! Yes, I figure this approach will be quite challenging
to implement, and may not be worth the cost.
Anshum,
I had not thought of versioning (
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_2/updating-parts-of-documents.html#document-centric-versioning-constraints),
but will consider it. Ye
Hello Solr Users Group,
My employer (Smarsh) is having trouble filling a couple Solr Engineering
roles. We are now turning to finding solid Java engineers with an interest
in learning search. While I can provide some on the job training, we are
looking for recommendations for Solr training (a da
ounts of temporal data.
>
> Also, it's open source so if something needs tweaking the process for that
> is open and well defined :) As with everything technical, test often and
> test well.
>
> -Gus
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:07 AM Matt Kuiper wrote:
>
, 2021, 2:56 PM Matt Kuiper wrote:
> Thanks David, this test link is helpful.
>
> @David @Gus - From your viewpoint do you see TRAs as an accepted/proven
> technique within SolrCloud? My small POC works great. Would like to hear
> if others are using TRA in production deployments
ley
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 9:26 PM Matt Kuiper wrote:
>
> > I found some helpful information while testing TRAs:
> >
> > For our use-case I am hesitant to set up an autoDeleteAge (unless it can
> be
> > modified - still need to test). So I wondered abo
to be able to
modify an existing TRA and delete older collections.
Matt
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:27 AM Matt Kuiper wrote:
> Hi Gus, Jan,
>
> I am considering implementing TRA for a large-scale Solr deployment. Your
> Q&A is helpful!
>
> I am curious if you have expe
Hi Gus, Jan,
I am considering implementing TRA for a large-scale Solr deployment. Your
Q&A is helpful!
I am curious if you have experience/ideas regarding modifying the TR Alias
when one desires to manually delete old collections or modify the
router.autoDeleteAge to shorten or extend the delete
th Solr 8.8+ you get the effect of SOLR-15049. It is a
> massive performance improvement. In my testing it was 7000 times faster
> then the standard join parser plugin for larger joins.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
&
is
> almost as fast.
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:31 AM Matt Kuiper wrote:
>
> > Thanks Joel!
> >
> > On my list is to investigate Block Joins and Nested Child docs.
> >
> >
> >
>
tremely fast that you could
> take advantage of if you did this.
>
> Let me know if this might be an option for you and we can discuss the
> optimized self join in more detail.
>
> Joel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.
-join
Matt
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:59 AM Matt Kuiper wrote:
> Hi Solr Group,
>
> I am not sure the following is a viable use-case, welcoming input and any
> implementation recommendations.
>
> I would like to perform joins over two sharded collections. Where docs
> are rout
Hi Solr Group,
I am not sure the following is a viable use-case, welcoming input and any
implementation recommendations.
I would like to perform joins over two sharded collections. Where docs are
routed to specific shards based on a date range and are the same for shards
in each collection.
I u
.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/6.0.0/
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:43 PM Matt Kuiper wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I started here:
> >
> > [image: image.png]
> >
> > Followed the Older releases link:
> > [image: image.png]
> >
> &
Hello,
I started here:
[image: image.png]
Followed the Older releases link:
[image: image.png]
Selected a couple different Mirrors and only see these versions:
[image: image.png]
Any tips on how to get Solr 6.x versions?
Thanks,
Matt
18 matches
Mail list logo
