e not possible. Underneath it's called block join. A
parent doc must go together with children. You can experiment with query
time join {!join}, which provides more indexing flexibility trading off
query performance.
Thanks,
Mikhail
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:48 AM Dwane Hall wrote:
> Hey S
Hey Solr Community,
Does anyone know if it's possible to manage the parent/child relationship for
nested documents manually? (i.e I manage the "_root_" relationship outside of
Solr and still take advantage of block join functionality?).
Typically nested documents are defined as follows:
In
Hey Rebecca when we were just beginning our Solr journey we undertook the
entire sematext training suite (https://sematext.com/training/solr/). Rafal and
Radu have a lot of experience with Solr and Elastic Search and we were
extremely impressed with it and its value. We're in the southern hemisp
Hey Jan I read through the JIRA thread and it's an interesting discussion. For
our circumstances we typically use a combination of A and B but my guess is our
environment is atypical as none of our hosts are exposed externally or have
internet connectivity. Getting the images on our hosts is a
Hey Steven,
I'd also recommend watching Jason Gerlowski's excellent talk at Activate a few
years ago he walks through SolrJ, some best practices, different types of
clients, and common mistakes. This should be a good starting point for using
SolrJ along with the official docs which have some c
p.
Cheers,
Dwane
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Tuesday, 17 August 2021 11:51 PM
To: users@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax mysteries?
On 8/17/2021 1:31 AM, Dwane Hall wrote:
> Query 2 using qf=ST_Field1 LC_Field1
> When I use a "lowercase" fieldType
Hi all,
A quick question regarding query analysis if someone is feeling brave and knows
a bit about the edismax parser's behaviour?!
It's probably best explained as an example:
I have 3 fields with two field types (defined below)
ST_Field1 - Field type of search_text
ST_Field2 - Field type of s
Hey Lulu,
While this is not a Solr specific issue I suspect your server is not configured
to accept connections over older TLS/SSL versions but without seeing the
handshake it can only be an assumption. So in this instance setting your
client to handshake over TLS 1.1 is not going to fix your
the checks and Solr gets start=399. A
few of those will use all of heap and take down the server process.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 6:40 PM, Dwane Hall wrote:
>
> Hey Walter,
>
> Can you s
Hey Walter,
Can you set the value for start (0) and rows (your default sensible response
row size) as an invariant in the request handler you're using so it can't be
overridden from a client request? That's how I've defended against it from
Solr's perspective in the past. This can be hard coded
handled
by the framework, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13837
Solr should probably attempt to decode the POST body in case of SearchHandler.
Jan
> 19. jun. 2021 kl. 03:13 skrev Dwane Hall :
>
> Hey Solr community,
>
> I'm just enquiring if anyone has tried usi
Hey Solr community,
I'm just enquiring if anyone has tried using the audit logging capabilities in
Solr 8? https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/audit-logging.html#audit-logging.
Historically on the 7.x beaches of Solr I've had to capture request details by
reducing the log level of the request han
Hey Jerome,
Are you using Solr Cloud? If so you'll require a reindex as you hint at below
(Solr committers recommend reindexing through major version jumps anyway).
From memory you need to be on at least a 7.x version of Solr to be able to
upgrade to 8.x and the newer 8.x releases (from about
I really like the idea. I too have had instances in the past where (some)
updates fail because of long (ish) gc pause times due to overloading and having
the option to pause indexing and give Solr a chance to catch up would very
useful. I typically have a retry clause managing these issues but
March 2021 10:15 AM
To: users@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Admin Page Metrics
I’d love to see a Jira issue created and a PR opened against
https://github.com/apache/solr <https://github.com/apache/solr> for this. Tag
me and I’ll review it.
> On Mar 11, 2021, at 6:13 PM, Dwa
.javaMemoryTotalDisplay = pretty_print_bytes($scope.javaMemoryTotal);
$scope.javaMemoryUsedDisplay = pretty_print_bytes($scope.javaMemoryUsed); //
@todo These should really be an AngularJS Filter: {{ javaMemoryUsed | bytes }}
$scope.javaMemoryMax = pretty_print_bytes(javaMemoryMax);
var par
Hey Solr community. I started playing around with the 8.8.1 docker image today
and noticed issues with the JVM and host memory 'Bar' graphs from the dashboard
page of the Solr Admin interface. It also appeares the "JVM" parameters were
not listed here but definitely configured as expected as the
17 matches
Mail list logo
