Re: Suggestions to improve Star queries latencies

2023-11-17 Thread Mike Drob
Maybe also experiment with cache=false On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 2:38 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > > What causes this issue? > You may try to find an answer with distrib=false and debug=timing > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM rajani m wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > Thank you for all the

Re: Suggestions to improve Star queries latencies

2023-11-17 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
> What causes this issue? You may try to find an answer with distrib=false and debug=timing On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM rajani m wrote: > Hi again, > > Thank you for all the pointers, they were very helpful. After digging in > enough, I figured that it is a certain text field that matc

Re: Suggestions to improve Star queries latencies

2023-11-17 Thread rajani m
Hi again, Thank you for all the pointers, they were very helpful. After digging in enough, I figured that it is a certain text field that matches a large set of docs for a given query. And it is the one adding to the latency. Appreciate any suggestions to optimize it. An example query that mat

Re: Solr 8.11.2 - remote updates

2023-11-17 Thread Saur, Alexandre (ELS-AMS)
Hi Shawn, Many thanks for the prompt explanation. You’re right, my email client sent some weird stuff but as I said I was not concerned with the error per se. We identified what’s wrong with the delete command (some characters in the query value used are not valid, like a colon `:`). Here is an