Hoss, Thanks for the update. Any idea how to handle this exact query (which
was giving no results before upgrade and now gives error and pushes query
to a big loop for maxBooleanClauses issue ) , Many regards.
http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select?start=0&rows=0&defType=edismax&pf=title
: Mikhail, Thanks for the comment. Is this considered a bug or as a new
: feature with no plan to address this type of query expansion in further
: releases?
It is a documented feature in Lucene (to prevent query explosion) with the
change in behavior called out in the "Major Changes" section o
Mikhail, thanks for the clarification. Many regards..
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:04 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> It's a feature. No plan to address, beside my earlier idea to prototype
> expansion to intervals, but I couldn't find anyone who's interested in
> evaluation, and suspended prototyping
Just got to give this a try and it worked GREAT!Here is the working example
(that will be in the upcoming “How to use Vectors” tutorial):
let(
a=select(
search(films,
qt="/select",
q="name:"Finding Nemo" OR name:"Bee Movie" OR name:"Harry Potter and
the Chamber of S
Hey,
If I want to rerank (rq={!ltr ...}) the window of top-k results but that top-k
is not selected by a regular query-to-doc similarity score, but by a value of a
date field (so technically, rerank k most recent), how should I do it?
Is ?q={!func}ms(my_date_field) the only way?
Or is there a
It's a feature. No plan to address, beside my earlier idea to prototype
expansion to intervals, but I couldn't find anyone who's interested in
evaluation, and suspended prototyping. So, it's worth revising the problem
definition and approach.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 5:40 PM Karun G wrote:
> Mikha
Mikhail, Thanks for the comment. Is this considered a bug or as a new
feature with no plan to address this type of query expansion in further
releases?
thanks.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 3:00 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Here's the Lucene change
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10247
> It
Hey, thanks for sharing.
Each version of the operator supports a range of Solr versions. The latest
operator version (0.8.0) only supports Solr versions >= 8.11. It looks
like the tutorial you were following along with hasn't been updated to
match the range of Solr versions, which is definitely
Hello Jan,
Thanks for the article and suggestions.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 2:11 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's going on is Lucene doing merges of segments, and when it so does,
> all documents marked for deletion in the old segments are gone, freeing up
> space. I recommend planning for
Here's the Lucene change
https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10247
It will be interesting to experiment with old logic of deeply nesting
spans, but with intervals.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:00 PM Karun G wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to upgrade from solr 8.9.0 to 9.2 and got the issue as below.
10 matches
Mail list logo
