Re: Requests taking hours on solr cloud

Thanks, Shawn I will check that too. On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 12:42 AM Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 12/22/22 02:49, Satya Nand wrote: > > I looked at the stack trace but I couldn't know for sure why the thread > is > > waiting. can anyone help me in decoding this? > > > > > - locked <0x00054cd27

child documents anyone?

Hi all, has anyone ever gotten child documents to work in 8.11? I'm trying to add them in a separate batch w/ setting _root_=$ID_OF_PARENT, _nest_path_=$SOMETHING and so far I'm unable to get anything from The Fine Manual's examples (https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/searching-nested-documen

Re: Reg. Field Level Update (Atomic update) (Solr 8.11.1) behavior

On 12/22/22 10:04, Natarajan, Rajeswari wrote: Thanks for the response .On further testing , I found it doesn't work well. I expected the field level update to fail while publishing ,but it succeeds and the searches behave differently If the schema doesn't meet those requirements for Atomic U

Re: Requests taking hours on solr cloud

On 12/22/22 02:49, Satya Nand wrote: I looked at the stack trace but I couldn't know for sure why the thread is waiting. can anyone help me in decoding this? - locked <0x00054cd27c88> (a Search the thread dump for 0x00054cd27c88 to see what thread is holding that lock and what oth

Re: Problem with uniqueKey not resulting in existing document deletion

On 12/22/22 11:55, Shawn Heisey wrote: Which is different than what I had, but is still not going to work, because stored is false and useDocValueAsStored is not present, which seems to make it false.  That is probably a bug. I would like to create two tests that use the _default configset and

Re: Problem with uniqueKey not resulting in existing document deletion

On 12/22/22 02:17, Eduardo Gomez wrote: As Jan mentioned, I experienced the same problem on Solr 8.11. I can see in your schema this commented out field: Does removing the comment solve the issue? What about leaving that commented out and also commenting out the _root_ field? In my case, eit

Re: Reg. Field Level Update (Atomic update) (Solr 8.11.1) behavior

Thanks for the response .On further testing , I found it doesn't work well. I expected the field level update to fail while publishing ,but it succeeds and the searches behave differently Regards, Rajeswari On 12/21/22, 11:43 PM, "Thomas Corthals" wrote: Hi Rajeswari, I think you're

Re: Requests taking hours on solr cloud

Hi, One thing I have noticed is that if I keep these servers ideal (move request to another infra) then the searcher gets closed after a few minutes. so somehow incoming traffic is responsible for the searcher not getting closed. This particular request took almost 6 hours and only got closed whe

Re: Solr 9 - XML QueryResponseWriter Indent

Joe, if you’d like to submit a patch to the ref guide, I’d be happy to work with you on it! > On Dec 21, 2022, at 2:50 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 12/21/22 08:24, Joe Jones (DHCW - Software Development) wrote: >> In transitioning from Solr 5.4.1 to 9.1 I am not sure if I have found a bug >>

Re: Requests taking hours on solr cloud

Hi Dominique, I looked at the stack trace but I couldn't know for sure why the thread is waiting. can anyone help me in decoding this? httpShardExecutor-7-thread-939362-processing-x:im-search-03-08-22_shard1_replica_p17 r:core_node18 http: 10.128.193.11:8985//solr//im-search-03-08-22_shard1_r

Re: Problem with uniqueKey not resulting in existing document deletion

As Jan mentioned, I experienced the same problem on Solr 8.11. I can see in your schema this commented out field: Does removing the comment solve the issue? What about leaving that commented out and also commenting out the _root_ field? In my case, either including or excluding both fields seem

Re: Problem with uniqueKey not resulting in existing document deletion

Have you tried indexing your _root_ field? Or removing the _root_ field? There was a similar issue regarding this and atomic update, but perhaps it is a more general issue? Jan > 22. des. 2022 kl. 03:05 skrev Shawn Heisey : > > I have a little Solr index for Dovecot full text search. > > Whil

Re: Grouping fails with "null" as the output value, while filter is working

Hi, mailing list strips the attachments, you probably need to provide links for screenshots. On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:17 PM NEERAJ VERMA wrote: > Solr's Grouping feature is not working for one of our datasets. It yields > the grouping field's value as *null* at times, randomly (we haven't > es

Grouping fails with "null" as the output value, while filter is working

Solr's Grouping feature is not working for one of our datasets. It yields the grouping field's value as *null* at times, randomly (we haven't established a pattern so far), and puts documents in a single bucket while the field's value is different for each doc. Filtering on the actual value of that

Grouping fails with "null" as the output value, while filter is working

Solr's Grouping feature is not working for one of our datasets. It yields the grouping field's value as *null* at times, randomly (we haven't established a pattern so far), and puts documents in a single bucket while the field's value is different for each doc. Filtering on the actual value of that