Hi, Dwane.
Breaking blocks are not possible. Underneath it's called block join. A
parent doc must go together with children. You can experiment with query
time join {!join}, which provides more indexing flexibility trading off
query performance.
Thanks,
Mikhail
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:48 AM Dwane
Thanks Joel.Any sample will help to try out.
Regards
Ravi
On Wed, 7 Sep, 2022, 19:30 Joel Bernstein, wrote:
> You could upack the tree from the fields in the tuples but that would be
> extra work.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:51 AM Shankar R
Hi everybody!
Is there anyone here that’s been working with collapse/expand and come up with
a similar issue? (Solr 8.11)
My query returns two items in the response results, but when using
collapse/expand on those to group them by a field,
they are not included at all in the expanded response
Hi All,
We have recently moved from solr 6.5 to solr cloud 8.10.
*Earlier Architecture:*We were using a master-slave architecture where we
had 4 slaves(14 cpu, 96 GB ram, 20 GB Heap, 110 GB index size). We used to
optimize and replicate nightly.
*Now.*
We didn't have a clear direction on the nu
Hii Joel, Thanks for the reply.
But I was not able to find any official documentation stating multiple
collapses. It would be helpful if you got any article about that.
Also the second collapse would be on the main result set I believe. We
can't do that on expanded results?
On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at
Thanks, Shawn.
I will try to create another post covering as many details as possible,
then somebody from this mailing list can help me in reviewing my
architecture,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:21 PM Shawn Heisey
wrote:
> On 8/31/22 23:52, Satya Nand wrote:
> > Thank you Shawn.
> > If I eliminate
Hey Solr Community,
Does anyone know if it's possible to manage the parent/child relationship for
nested documents manually? (i.e I manage the "_root_" relationship outside of
Solr and still take advantage of block join functionality?).
Typically nested documents are defined as follows:
In
The sort is on a tokenized field. You'll likely need to sort on a string or
SortableTextField to get the correct ordering.
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_6/field-types-included-with-solr.html
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 8:37 AM Netta Steinberg wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to upgrade SOLR from version 8.11.1 to 9.0.0. When I try to
create a new index on Solr 9, I’m getting an Read access denied error.
We are storing the core data on a shared drive mount under systems *D:\*
drive as *D:\SolrHomeDrive\* [created via mlink *pointing to
\\206.XXX.XXX
On 8/31/22 23:52, Satya Nand wrote:
Thank you Shawn.
If I eliminate this indexing node and create 8 NRT shards on these 8 query
nodes. Meaning indexing will be happening on all 8 nodes and queries too.
Will it create any impact on response time? currency commit interval is 15
minus.
Heavy ind
You could upack the tree from the fields in the tuples but that would be
extra work.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:51 AM Shankar R wrote:
> Thanks a lot Joel. if we need hierarchical facets then we cannot use
> streaming expressions right?
>
> Regards
>
@David & Markus
You are right, that was my last problem, shame on me. :(
I didn't changed something the last years at our schema, it only works, so i'm
not a solr-proffessional ;)
Thank you very much for your help, have a great week!
regards
Carsten
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
*what Markus said (just beat ya to it by a minute :))
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:22 AM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> You forgot to add ASCIIFoldingFilter to IndexAnalyzer, please try again
> with:
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> preserveOrigi
Hi Karsten,
You forgot to add ASCIIFoldingFilter to IndexAnalyzer, please try again
with:
I removed the stopwords filter because it is not recommended for regular
text search.
Regards,
Markus
Don't mean to interrupt, but out of curiosity why is
ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory
only in the query analyzer, not the indexer? wouldn't it need to be in
both to get the desired result?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 8:59 AM Carsten Klement
wrote:
>
>
>-
> Hi Markus, thank you, yes i think
-
Hi Markus, thank you, yes i think i have another problem ;) I tried
with ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory, but analysis shows dèkor instead of decor. I
use an Solr-cluster with 3 Nodes (3 replica), i droped collection and create a
new one, but perhaps there is the problem?
Hello all,
I have 3 indexed items. Each item has a field named TITLE_Name_t. The TITLE_
Name_t value has the same prefix for all three items, but a different suffix.
The values are:
THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX217330-M
THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX218328-M
THE PROMISE YR. 2 (SVOD)_PX217328-M
So the
Hello Stephen,
Using Solr 8.8.1 i tried to reproduce your strange problem, copied your
schema and indexed a single document. As expected, i got exactly one result
for all four combinations, also using both the default Lucene QParser and
the Edismax QParser.
So it appears to work just fine here on
Hello Karsten,
I added your config snippet, but with the ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory
replacing MappingCharFilterFactory, to one of my collections and reloaded
the collection. Using Solr's analysis page i tested if it works, and it
does. Can you test the field on your collection? Analysis should be o
Hi Markus,
thank you for your reply.
I dropped the collection and create a new one for my tests, but now i also
reloaded the collection, but i doesn't change anything.
search for "thé" is fine, but search for "the" didn't bring the result.
I also testet solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory
Hello Karsten,
The MappingCharFilterFactory should work just fine for German or French
accents with the default ISOLatin1Accent configuration file, although we
rarely use it. Instead, you can try the regular token filter . It does a similar job.
Do not forget to reload the Solr core/collection on
.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 11:22 AM Satya Nand wrote:
> Thank you Shawn.
> If I eliminate this indexing node and create 8 NRT shards on these 8 query
> nodes. Meaning indexing will be happening on all 8 nodes and queries too.
>
> Will it create any impact on response time? currency commit interval
Hi,
we use solr 6.6 and use a quicksearch on our website. For this case we
copy some data fields to an field called "schnellsuche", this worked
fine a few years.
Now we want import french data with Accent-Keys, for example "thé". The
user should find the same results, if he search for "thé"
23 matches
Mail list logo
