Hi;
Can this vulnerability to exploited in Solr 8.11.1? solr 8.11.1 has log4j 2.16
but I couldn't find a log4j.properties files in the distribution setting a
non-default layout pattern (with or without context lookup). Any idea when Solr
would do a release with log4j 2.17.1?
Thanks in advance
Force a commit on the failover and see what happens.
Using OS-level disk replication is definitely the cause.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 2:42 PM Heller, George A III CTR (USA)
wrote:
>
> >
> > Can you expand on "replication" and "indexing" and also versions of solr
> > etc?
> >
> INDEXING - We are
re-trying bounce
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:55 AM matthew sporleder wrote:
>
> Can you expand on "replication" and "indexing" and also versions of solr etc?
>
> Does the "replica" respond with data or does it give a blank? Does it
> have files on its disk?
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:51 AM He
Can you expand on "replication" and "indexing" and also versions of solr etc?
Does the "replica" respond with data or does it give a blank? Does it
have files on its disk?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:51 AM Heller, George A III CTR (USA)
wrote:
>
> We have Solr installed on a primary server and
We have Solr installed on a primary server and a failover server. When I index
a collection on the primary, all the files indexed are created on disk and get
copied to disk on the failover server via replication.
Querying the core on the primary shows the correct number of documents
(numFound=
Hello,
I got ERROR unknown field ...
from solr admin web page logging and
I wonder why "commit" method of ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient returns
UpdateResponse with successful status code 0 (UNKNOWN) even if there is an
exception?
We used solr 8.5.0.
Best regards,
Burak Yaşar
Hi Christine
This part of the response is built from a SimpleOrderedMap and json.nl only
affects the representation of plain NamedLists.
Regards
Thomas
Op di 22 feb. 2022 om 19:27 schreef Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> JSON responses often can be customised with the
Hi,
At our organisation we're still on solr 7.2.1. We'd like to use prometheus,
just wondering if anyone had knowledge that the 7.3 prometheus contrib will
work with solr 7.2.1?
Also we're thinking of having it work on a separate docker container to the
solr docker containers, connecting to the