The "Provider \"c\" not installed" message seems to indicate that Solr
is reading the "c:/" at the start of your "location" parameter as a
URI protocol in the vein of "http://";, "file://", "hdfs://", etc.
Outside of that though I'm not sure how you could tweak the "location"
to prevent that, and
+1 - this looks like a gap in SolrJ's coverage of JSON Facets. Please
create a JIRA ticket and mention the ticket here.
I'm familiar with that piece of SolrJ and would be happy to
review/merge if anyone has a chance to write a patch.
Best,
Jason
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:44 AM Joel Bernstein
I would assume it's just sorting by UTF8 decimal order like most programming
languages do. See:
https://www.w3schools.com/charsets/ref_utf_basic_latin.asp
https://www.w3schools.com/charsets/ref_utf_latin1_supplement.asp
I believe you'll have to either store a new field with a custom sort (if you
You can use the ICU Collation Field instead of string:
This sorts numbers and letters correctly, as well as does Unicode folding, so
1,2,3...10...20, instead of 1,10...2,20...,3, and folds the characters so that
ä,á, etc. are sorted as "a".
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/language-anal
I haven't used it personally, but for fine grained control you might want
to look at using either ICUCollationField or CollationField as documented
here:
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_10/language-analysis.html#sorting-text-with-custom-rules
There is a write up about implementing a custom sort or
Hello Sebastian,
This the natural sort order, just look at an ASCII-table. If you want
charachters nicely bundled together you can either make a complicated
Comparator or CopyField the original string value to a analyzed Text field
that has a KeywordTokenizer, and an ASCIIFoldingFilter configured.
I am using Solr 8.10
LITTERA Software & Consulting GmbH
A-6060 Hall i.T., Haller Au 19a
Telefon: +43 (0) 50 765 000, Fax: +43 (0) 50 765 118
Sitz: Hall in Tirol, eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Innsbruck,
Firmenbuch-Nr. FN 295807k, geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Albert
Un
Hello,
I have documents with family names in german language context.
The field type is defined like this:
When sorting by this family name, I get results ordered like that:
Ascending order:
1. Bart
2. Otz
3. Ozzbourne
4. Zacharias
5. bariton
6. biene
7. burtsch
8. ozza
9. Ádele
10. Òle
11. Ônn
we've tried to check if that's the problem but we couldn't really understand
how to check that...
what were the parameters you changed specifically? (we work with linux)
thanks,
123456780sss
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, January 22nd, 2022 at 7:34 PM, Rajendra Gaikwad
wrote:
