Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

On 12/15/21 11:53 AM, Scott Derrick wrote: I find these files in my solr install ./server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-1.2-api-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-api-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.11.0.jar ./contrib/prometheus-exporter/lib/log4j-core-2.11.0

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

That should be sufficient based on our current understanding of the situation, yes. On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:53 PM Scott Derrick wrote: > I find these files in my solr install > > ./server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.0.jar > ./server/lib/ext/log4j-1.2-api-2.11.0.jar > ./server/lib/ext/log4j-api-2.

Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

I find these files in my solr install ./server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-1.2-api-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-api-2.11.0.jar ./server/lib/ext/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.11.0.jar ./contrib/prometheus-exporter/lib/log4j-core-2.11.0.jar ./contrib/prometheus-exporter/lib/log4j

Re: Query on CVE-2021-45046

I would also encourage you to do the upgrade first on QA/Staging rather than directly on production, where possible. This could prevent nasty binary incompatibilities where the Solr build expects certain methods from the compiled log4j library, that mismatch with the upgraded jar. And a crashed off

Re: running Solr 6.6 with OpenJDK 11?

On 2021-12-15 11:06 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: ... I did an experiment, replacing the bin/solr script in 6.6.6 with the bin/solr script from 8.11.0 ... although I have not done extensive testing, this appears to work.  It was able to start Solr, and was also able to start the cloud example, with "

Re: running Solr 6.6 with OpenJDK 11?

On 12/15/21 9:14 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: I am in the process of downloading 6.6.6 so I can do some testing.  Transfer speed from archive.apache.org is terrible, I should be done with the download in about 15 minutes. Out of the box, Solr 6.6.6 refuses to start with Java 11.  It actually r

Re: Does Solr 3.6.1 support FIPS 140-2

On 12/15/21 7:01 AM, Steven White wrote: Does anyone know if Solr 3.6.1 supports FIPS 140-2? Solr 3.6.1 was announced on July 22, 2012.  Over nine years ago. At that time, Solr itself didn't have any kind of encryption capability.  If you want to enable encryption for that version of Solr, yo

Re: Query on CVE-2021-45046

On 12/15/21 9:41 AM, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: Hello, is it safe to simply replace the jars in the solr lib/ext folder with version 2.16 or are they hardcoded in scripts or meta-inf files ? This appears to work correctly if the original version of log4j included was 2.14.1.  I have done thi

Re: Query on CVE-2021-45046

Hello, is it safe to simply replace the jars in the solr lib/ext folder with version 2.16 or are they hardcoded in scripts or meta-inf files ? Thanks — Ing. Andrea Vettori Responsabile Sistemi Informativi B2BIres s.r.l. > On 15 Dec 2021, at 17:32, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 12/14/21 10:55 PM,

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

That is fixed in log4j 2.16.0, included in Solr 8.11.1. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Dec 15, 2021, at 4:40 AM, e_bri...@videotron.ca wrote: > > Hi all, > > Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has > re

Re: Query on CVE-2021-45046

On 12/14/21 10:55 PM, Soh Jia Yu, Eunice wrote: We've implemented this step "Otherwise, remove the JndiLookup class from the classpath: zip -q -d log4j-core-*.jar org/apache/logging/log4j/core/lookup/JndiLookup.class" from https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html for /server/lib/ext.

Re: running Solr 6.6 with OpenJDK 11?

On 12/15/21 12:57 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote: To get away from the Oracle License by switching from Java 8 to OpenJDK 8, do you have any observations or measurements? What I have seen says that OpenJDK 8 is solid.  In the last few years, I have not had first-hand access to large-scale Solr insta

Query on CVE-2021-45046

Hi, We've implemented this step "Otherwise, remove the JndiLookup class from the classpath: zip -q -d log4j-core-*.jar org/apache/logging/log4j/core/lookup/JndiLookup.class" from https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html for /server/lib/ext. We would like to check if /contrib/promet

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

Keep in mind that you can have more than one log4j-core-*.jar to patch. In my case: /opt/solr-8.4.0/server/lib/ext/log4j-core-2.11.2.jar /opt/solr-8.4.0/contrib/prometheus-exporter/lib/log4j-core-2.11.2.jar Thomas Op wo 15 dec. 2021 om 13:52 schreef Bernd Fehling < bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

> > Is there already an Idea when 8.11.1 is supposed to be released ? This was discussed yesterday. Check the archives for the full explanation. Short version: can’t give a definite date but it will be no sooner than a week from now.

Does Solr 3.6.1 support FIPS 140-2

Hi everyone, Does anyone know if Solr 3.6.1 supports FIPS 140-2? Thanks Steve

AW: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

Is there already an Idea when 8.11.1 is supposed to be released ? Jens Viebig Software Developer o: +49 4307 8358 0 f: +49 4307 8358 699 jens.vie...@vitec.com www.vitec.com Legal Notice Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for th

AW: Using join queries with synchronous filterCache is not supported

Thanks, We still used LRUCache in our config which seems to be deprecated, updating the config to use CaffeineCache seems to do the trick. Best Regards Jens Jens Viebig Software Developer o: +49 4307 8358 0 f: +49 4307 8358 699 jens.vie...@vitec.com www.vitec.com Legal Notice Unless expressl

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

We just upgraded to log4j2-2.16. It disables jndi lookups altogether by default. -Rahul On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:40 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has > recommendations about CVE-2021-45046? > > Eric Briere >

Re: Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

Isn't the example with "zip -q -d ..." as reported in the CVE not working for you? Regards Bernd Am 15.12.21 um 13:40 schrieb e_bri...@videotron.ca: Hi all, Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has recommendations about CVE-2021-45046? Eric Briere

Log4J saga (CVE-2021-45046)

Hi all, Looks like we are not done with log4j security problems. Someone has recommendations about CVE-2021-45046? Eric Briere

Re: Using join queries with synchronous filterCache is not supported

Hello, Jens. Have you considered turning async=true for the cache? On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 1:49 PM Jens Viebig wrote: > Hi List, > Since upgrading from solr 8.8.2 to 8.11.0 we get the following error > message: > > Using join queries with synchronous filterCache is not supported! Details > can b

Using join queries with synchronous filterCache is not supported

Hi List, Since upgrading from solr 8.8.2 to 8.11.0 we get the following error message: Using join queries with synchronous filterCache is not supported! Details can be found in Solr Reference Guide under 'query-settings-in-solrconfig'. Looking at the commit history this was recently added: https

Read-only user in solr not working as expected

Dear solr community, I would like to create two users in solr: An admin and a dev. The dev should not be able to edit the solr metadata. This user should not be able to use solr.add or solr delete, I would like him only to be able to use solr.search for our metadata solr-core (in python pysolr)

Re: Zookeeper and Solr and CVE-2021-44228

To unsubscribe, see https://solr.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists-chat Jan > 15. des. 2021 kl. 04:30 skrev John Eberly : > > unsubscribe > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:53 AM Walter Underwood > wrote: > >> Zookeeper 3.5.7 uses log4j 1.x, so is not vulnerable. I checked. >> >> wunder