Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

outer performance. - Original Message - > From: "Ted Ross" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:26:03 PM > Subject: Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try) > > Thanks for this Mick, > > The original co

Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

Yes, this was with iperf3 -- I will see what I can do with AMQP. On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 2:32 PM Ted Ross wrote: > Thanks for this Mick, > > The original context of the request for this graph was the AMQP > large-message testing. Was this test run using iperf over the TCP > adaptor? If so, it

Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

Thanks for this Mick, The original context of the request for this graph was the AMQP large-message testing. Was this test run using iperf over the TCP adaptor? If so, it's possible that the buffering between the adaptor and Proton is obscuring the results. I suspect that in the absence of vect

Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

I keep forgetting that I can't include images. Here it is. I'm afraid there's not much of any knee in this curve. By the way, CPU was almost unaffec

Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points

I'm afraid there's not much of any knee in this curve. By the way, CPU was almost unaffected. Actually it improved slightly, from 208% at 512 byte buffer, to 195 for buf=2048 to 191 for buf=3072 and above. [image: buffer_vs_throughput.jpg]