I concur with the reasoned replies to my negative vote and switch my vote
to +1.
I also note that the valgrind error goes away if I remove the
pkcs11-provider package. To me, this implies that if there is a leak, it is
not in Proton. And as Andrew points out, the “leak” is small in size and
its li
+1
* Built and tested on FreeBSD14 with valgrind (AMD64 in a VM)
- No build/test errors
- C/C++/Python only
* Built and tested on Raspberry Pi 5 with valgrind (PiOS based on
debian 12.8)
- No build/test errors
- C/C++/Python/Ruby
* Built and tested on Fedora 41 with valgrind (x86_64)
- No bui
On 11/20/24 13:12, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a first spin for a Qpid Proton 0.40.0 release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The files can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.40.0-rc1/
The JIRAs assigned are:
https://is
I've spent a bit of time looking at this and I think this is the result of
the new provider code in OpenSSL. It is still quite new, so very likely has
some issues like this.
So:
* I don't think it's a regression in proton
* The leak is tiny (only 32 bytes) over a full program run.
* Arguably it's
+1
- verified signature and sha512 checksum
- built C and Python bindings on fedora 40 - Debug and RelWithDebInfo
- ctest passes (with caveat)
- ran against skupper-router CI - no failures
Caveat: the proton python-pep8-test fails for me when I run ctest. However
python-pep8-test fails for me wit
By all means take some time to investigate, and we can ultimately
decide how to proceed based on what you find. If it turns out this
isnt a regression then it doesnt necessarily immediately seem like a
blocker either. We will do more releases, and it's essentially the
same amount of work for me to
-1
I started by upgrading my test machine to fedora 41 from fedora 40. Default
build and test now fails with a new valgrind error in OpenSSL
initialization.
I get the same error with Proton 0.39, so presumably the error is the
result of a newer version of OpenSSL or valgrind and not a regression
+1
I checked things over as follows:
- Verified the signature + checksum files.
- Checked for LICENCE + NOTICE files present in the archive.
- Ran the build + tests and installed.
Robbie
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 18:12, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a first spin for a
+1
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Checked for presence of LICENSE and NOTICE files
* Built qpid-proton from source and ran tests on Fedora 40. All tests passed
* Built skupper-router using Proton 0.40.0 and ran all skupper-router
tests, all tests passed.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 1:19 PM Rob
