This seems very sensible proposal and makes allot of sense.
Like you have said, we are only saying we wont guarantee compatibility but
aren't going to leave people stuck if they are restricted so hard top argue
with.
Andrew
On 10 April 2014 21:10, Fraser Adams wrote:
> All fair enough comment
All fair enough comments Robbie, but at least I prompted a bit more
discussion :-D
F.
On 10/04/14 20:25, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 10 April 2014 19:03, Fraser Adams wrote:
From a *really parochial* perspective I've done a straw poll of my
organisation and was astonished to find we're more
On 10 April 2014 19:03, Fraser Adams wrote:
> From a *really parochial* perspective I've done a straw poll of my
> organisation and was astonished to find we're more or less ahead of the
> curve :-D
>
>
With all the recent security related issues, I've found that the people who
are inclined to ev
What would the purpose of this be? With the build system changes we are
getting developers ready to use a new different environment, testing that
the build generates the same output, etc... I think the change from Java 6
to Java 7 is hardly of the same nature. We've already been running
"paralle
Hi Jakub,
yeah this is also my experience... we have a whole load of people stuck on
really outdated versions... and most other people are already on Java 7 or
planning to move. Moreover most people don't take new versions of the Qpid
libraries straight away either... (or those that do are also t
Hi Rob,
People always need a proper motivation to upgrade from outdated Java to
something newer ... and you can motivate them. (I know, this is not really
the objection you are asking for)
A bit to my surprise, so far nobody from my colleagues seemed to have
problem with this idea. I guess it mus
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
> I am however a bit disappointed by the lack of response on this thread,
> though perhaps silence is simply acceptance? I guess that I also can't help
> but wonder that we ended up going through a couple of releases before we
> properly killed
From a *really parochial* perspective I've done a straw poll of my
organisation and was astonished to find we're more or less ahead of the
curve :-D
from a personal perspective, as I said earlier I'm largely agnostic
I am however a bit disappointed by the lack of response on this thread,
thou
Just bumping this thread again - does anyone have any objections... I'd
plan on moving forward with switching the builds to 1.7 sometime next
week if we haven't heard any by then
-- Rob
On 8 April 2014 00:02, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> On 7 April 2014 19:30, Fraser Adams wrote:
>
> > I think tha
On 7 April 2014 19:30, Fraser Adams wrote:
> I think that this definitely needs input from the broad community. I can
> see where you're coming from, but my observations of large Enterprises
> (which TBH are often the main consumers of Messaging products) are that
> they are often in a difficult
On 7 April 2014 20:30, Fraser Adams wrote:
> I think that this definitely needs input from the broad community.
Hence the mail :-)
> I can see where you're coming from, but my observations of large
> Enterprises (which TBH are often the main consumers of Messaging products)
> are that they a
I think that this definitely needs input from the broad community. I can
see where you're coming from, but my observations of large Enterprises
(which TBH are often the main consumers of Messaging products) are that
they are often in a difficult position wrt. keeping up with the times.
Don't ta
I think this makes sense. We waited too long to drop support for Java 5,
lets not repeat that with 6. Beginning to depend on Java 7 after three
years doesnt seem unreasonable to me.
Those those who 'cant' or dont want to upgrade to such 'new' (i.e really
quite old now) Java releases are often like
All,
now that Java 8 has been released, and Java 6 has been officially EOLd for
well over a year, I'd like to propose that we make 0.28 the last release
for which we officially support Java 6. As a library provider I'm aware
that we need to strive to make our libraries as widely adoptable as
poss
14 matches
Mail list logo
