Re: qpid 0.12 make fails on Linux Mint 12 (I think derived from Ubuntu 11.10)

ts, but losing smooth quid support seems hardly a bargain. :( Cheers, Kalle.

Uncanny differences

s. Messages seem to go to just one consumer (which ever got the message first). This would mean that they are in fact listening in a totally different pattern, than in the first case (topic with default exchange). Why does it work like this? Is this a bug, or a feature I've yet to learn to like? :) -- Kalle

Re: Messaging scenarios

Hi, It seems that what ever magic I was missing was bundled into using straight up JMS API. What they did in here: http://www.novell.com/documentation/extend52/Docs/help/MP/jms/tutorial/durable-1.htm helped me along. Thanks all! -- Kalle On Tuesday 3. January 2012 at 14.31, Kalle wrote

Fw: Messaging scenarios

forwarding wrongly targeted message to users list. -- Kalle Forwarded message: > From: Kalle > To: Gordon Sim > Date: Tuesday 3. January 2012 14.26.38 > Subject: Re: Messaging scenarios > > > Thanks for all the answers so far! > > Here is some of my code (edi

Messaging scenarios

f the broadcast requirement, QPID nodes are not in same network. 3) many-to-many messaging There are times when we have multiple pubs in the pubsub scheme. How do we do this? Would it be more routing inside the QPID, or what? Thanks for your time and inte

Re: Direct one-to-many

... Or is it so that I must make private queues, each attached to the same exchange? - Original Message - From: "Kalle Kärkkäinen" To: Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:24 PM Subject: Direct one-to-many Hi, I'm using M4 java and trunk cpp broker. i'm expe

Direct one-to-many

much so like to keep using amqp, as jms is not the target technology to learn here. I recognize that this probably work very well there. -- Kalle.

Re: ReplyTo header

Oh, live and learn. It works great now, thanks! -- Kalle - Original Message - From: "Gordon Sim" To: Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:01 PM Subject: Re: ReplyTo header Kalle Kärkkäinen wrote: I use direct queues and try to get replyto's working. I'm sending

Re: ReplyTo header

d in getEncodedType. I'm I using too cutting edge here? I'm using this raw'ish interface because it seems simpler and more intuitive than JMS, also should contain all the power of AMQP (I guess). -- Kalle

ReplyTo header

Hi all, I'm piecing together something and ran into a little bit of trouble. I'm using the raw-amqp in java with 0-10; with org.apache.qpid.transport.Connection and Session. It's working well with the cpp broker, no worries there. I use direct queues and try to get replyto's working. I'm sendi