Java client runtime
>> instead of the 0.10 one to see if that helps things.
>>
>>
>> FWIW I ended up rolling my own reconnection via a JMS Connection
>> ExceptionListener but as it turns out that approach is the most
>> useful in my case anyway as I want to in
Hello All,
I have a problem when using the java client libraries (0.10). I am
connecting to a Qpid broker version 0.8. The problem I have is easy to
re-create and has significant impact upon message loss for consuming
applications.
The problem can be summarised like so:-
1) Start a Qp
All,
I have been successfully using a federated network of Apache Qpid
brokers for some time now, we have had some problems along the way but
generally everything is working very well.
I have a requirement to introduce more resilience to parts of the
network. The (simplified) solution is t
All,
I have been successfully using a federated network of Apache Qpid
brokers for some time now, we have had some problems along the way but
generally everything is working very well.
I have a requirement to introduce more resilience to parts of the
network. The (simplified) solution is thi
Hi Carl,
Thanks for the response - I think I want the moon on a stick - but I
cannot rely on my publishers not to set the durable bit (especially as
it is on by default on a JMSMessage). So that won't quite do.
I have two federated brokers joined by a queue route and I want to
ensure that the
Hi Gordon,
FYI - I have tried adding unique keys to each of the subscribers but
unfortunately still get the same results.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: 14 July 2011 16:59
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic Routes and Duplicate M
Hi Gordon,
Thanks again for the reply.
We have designed an architecture which, at the moment, assumes use of
the Headers exchange and federated brokers.
I was looking at the static routes as a workaround for some earlier
issues I have raised with the headers exchange and dynamic routes, [1]
Hello All,
I'll try and keep this as simple as possible. I'm using C++ Apache Qpid
v0.8, and am having a problem when using dynamic routes with the headers
exchange.
FIRSTLY:
Send two messages to BROKER_A on the default headers exchange.
One Message has the headers :data-format=standard, dat
: Dynamic Routes with the Headers Exchange
On 06/13/2011 03:09 PM, Fallon, Richard wrote:
> Will the fix you have submitted need to be applied to the source
> broker, destination broker or both?
Strictly, only the source broker would require it (assuming
uni-directional routing). However it
the Headers Exchange
On 06/09/2011 01:50 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 01:44 PM, Fallon, Richard wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gordon,
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to look at this.
>>
>> Rather unfortunately our whole design has been centered around the
>>
e: Dynamic Routes with the Headers Exchange
On 06/09/2011 01:50 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 01:44 PM, Fallon, Richard wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gordon,
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to look at this.
>>
>> Rather unfortunately our whole design has been cent
Wow, that's good work!
I'll keep an eye on progress.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: 09 June 2011 13:51
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic Routes with the Headers Exchange
On 06/09/2011 01:44 PM, Fallon, Richard wrote:
>
utes with the Headers Exchange
On 06/09/2011 10:02 AM, Fallon, Richard wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Can anyone confirm if I can use dynamic routes with the headers
> exchange in Qpid 0.8 c++ broker?
It is certainly expected to work now. There are a handful of automate
> _
> From: Fallon, Richard
> Sent: 06 June 2011 17:14
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Dynamic Routes with the Headers Exchange
>
>
>
> All,
>
> I have been happily using federated brokers linked via
type queues, for the
client it is hard to find out that some messages have been overwritten - you
may need to introduce your own sequencing, depending on the details of your
environment.
Regards
Jakub
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 17:48, Fallon, Richard
wrote:
>
>
> I've not had ac
All,
I have been happily using federated brokers linked via dynamic routes
using the topic exchange. As you know this allows me to publish to one
broker and subscribe to that data from another, great!
However I have recently switched to using the headers exchange for
subscriptions, but am unab
2.1 of the "AMQP Messaging Broker
> (Implemented in C++)" book. Is a JIRA ticket used for the
> documentation changes as well? Should I enter one for this problem?
>
> Regards
> Jakub
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 16:48, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>> On Mon, May 9, 2
]
Sent: 01 April 2011 18:49
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Qpid Federation
What version(s) of Qpid and what platforms is this on?
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications
http://www.riverace.com
> -Original Message-
> From:
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications
http://www.riverace.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Fallon, Richard [mailto:richard.fal...@atosorigin.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 12:08 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Su
platforms is this on?
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications
http://www.riverace.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Fallon, Richard [mailto:richard.fal...@atosorigin.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 12:08 PM
> To: users@qpi
Hello,
I am running 2xQpid brokers on 2 different boxes across a number of
network hops, called SRC_BROKER and DEST_BROKER.
I am running a federated topology whereby the brokers are connected via
a durable dynamic route to the default topic exchange 'amq.topic' by
running the command
qpid-rou
21 matches
Mail list logo
