Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

2021-02-16 Thread Chuck Rolke
Http2 adaptor uses 16k (or so) -byte buffers between the adaptor and proton raw connection. The TCP adaptor could probably use the http2 buffering scheme and amortize the cost of doing a buffer copy between the 16k byte buffers and the normal dispatch buffers by doing fewer scheduling turns and sti

Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

2021-02-16 Thread Michael Goulish
Yes, this was with iperf3 -- I will see what I can do with AMQP. On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 2:32 PM Ted Ross wrote: > Thanks for this Mick, > > The original context of the request for this graph was the AMQP > large-message testing. Was this test run using iperf over the TCP > adaptor? If so, it

Re: Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

2021-02-16 Thread Ted Ross
Thanks for this Mick, The original context of the request for this graph was the AMQP large-message testing. Was this test run using iperf over the TCP adaptor? If so, it's possible that the buffering between the adaptor and Proton is obscuring the results. I suspect that in the absence of vect

Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points (2nd try)

2021-02-16 Thread Michael Goulish
I keep forgetting that I can't include images. Here it is. I'm afraid there's not much of any knee in this curve. By the way, CPU was almost unaffec

Router Throughput vs Buffer Size -- 11 data points

2021-02-16 Thread Michael Goulish
I'm afraid there's not much of any knee in this curve. By the way, CPU was almost unaffected. Actually it improved slightly, from 208% at 512 byte buffer, to 195 for buf=2048 to 191 for buf=3072 and above. [image: buffer_vs_throughput.jpg]

Re: [dispatch-router] 1.16.0 release schedule

2021-02-16 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 14:49, Ganesh Murthy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:52 AM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:41, Ken Giusti wrote: > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Now that Qpid Dispatch Router 1.15.0 has been released it's time to move > > on > > > to 1.16 develo

Re: Transparent PUB_SUB

2021-02-16 Thread Gordon Sim
On 16/02/2021 14:02, Tom van den Berg wrote: I'm currently working with qpid dispatch routers 1.15 and activeMQ artemis and I would like to create a transparent router network. The idea is that subscribers can connect to there local router and that there is a router somewhere in the network tha

Re: [dispatch-router] 1.16.0 release schedule

2021-02-16 Thread Ganesh Murthy
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:52 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:41, Ken Giusti wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > Now that Qpid Dispatch Router 1.15.0 has been released it's time to move > on > > to 1.16 development. > > > > I'd like to take this opportunity to propose that the proj

Transparent PUB_SUB

2021-02-16 Thread Tom van den Berg
Hi, I'm currently working with qpid dispatch routers 1.15 and activeMQ artemis and I would like to create a transparent router network. The idea is that subscribers can connect to there local router and that there is a router somewhere in the network that contains a connection to a broker. I

Re: [dispatch-router] 1.16.0 release schedule

2021-02-16 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:41, Ken Giusti wrote: > > Folks, > > Now that Qpid Dispatch Router 1.15.0 has been released it's time to move on > to 1.16 development. > > I'd like to take this opportunity to propose that the project adopt a > time-based release cycle for minor releases, starting with 1