[Qpid Dispatch Router] Multicast Credit Management

2019-11-12 Thread Ken Giusti
Folks, In response to the bug discussed in this email thread I'm proposing DISPATCH-1481 , which reverts the unconditional granting of credit on multicast links intro

Order of receivers from qpid::Session::nextReceiver() (with high load)

2019-11-12 Thread Toralf Lund
Good evening, all. I have an application that uses qpid::Session::nextReceiver() to handle data from 3 or 4 different AMQP 0-10 message queues - it follows the pattern from https://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-cpp-1.39.0/messaging-api/book/ch01s08.html. Question: If multiple receivers are r

Re: multicast without consumers

2019-11-12 Thread Ken Giusti
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:55 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I dont recall any mention of that element changing, so its presumably > whatever 1.9.0 does currently? Thats documented at: > > http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-dispatch-1.9.0/user-guide/index.html#message_settlement_and_reliability > >

Re: multicast without consumers

2019-11-12 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I dont recall any mention of that element changing, so its presumably whatever 1.9.0 does currently? Thats documented at: http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-dispatch-1.9.0/user-guide/index.html#message_settlement_and_reliability I've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1479 for

RE: multicast without consumers

2019-11-12 Thread VERMEULEN Olivier
Hello, Regarding the multicast , what will be the behavior in 1.10.0 if all *present* subscribers do not return the same acknowledgment? Thanks, Olivier -Original Message- From: Ken Giusti Sent: jeudi 7 novembre 2019 17:11 To: users Subject: Re: multicast without consumers On Thu, No