Jakub Scholz-2 wrote
> I had following packages installed from ppa:qpid/testing (+ some
> SASL libraries for authentication etc.):
> - libqpid-proton6
> - libqpidclient2
> - libqpidcommon2
> - libqpidmessaging2
> - libqpidtypes1
> - python-qpid-messaging
Jakub, I had most of what you listed (my p
Gordon Sim wrote
> Is there a particular reason for that choice? (The swigged
> qpid_messaging is not really a first-class client. It was more of an
> internal convenience for writing tests etc).
Thanks for the reply Gordon. As for the reason for the combo, we are a
Python shop, we are using Ac
Hi Mark,
Last time I used the Python binding against the C++ API on Ubuntu (I
actually use it against Qpid C++ broker and not against ActiveMQ, but with
AMQP 1.0) I had following packages installed from ppa:qpid/testing (+ some
SASL libraries for authentication etc.):
- libqpid-proton6
- libqpidcl
On 23/03/17 21:24, Mark Blum wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get amqp1.0 support working in Python so I can interact with
an ActiveMQ broker which supports amqp1.0.
What I can't figure out is what magic combination of steps will get this
working.
Note I am trying to use the messaging API at th
Hello all,
I'm trying to get amqp1.0 support working in Python so I can interact with
an ActiveMQ broker which supports amqp1.0.
What I can't figure out is what magic combination of steps will get this
working.
Note I am trying to use the messaging API at this time, not the proton
(reactor) API.
- Original Message -
> From: "Ted Ross"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 9:43:42 AM
> Subject: Qpid Dispatch Release Plans
>
> A couple of topics for discussion:
>
> Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 release
> ==
>
> As of now, the
Resending the closing vote email as my previous mail hasn't reached
the mailing list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Oleksandr Rudyy
Date: 21 March 2017 at 09:18
Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Qpid for Java 6.1.2
To: users@qpid.apache.org
There were 4 binding +1 votes and no o
