Hi Robbie,
I did not notice that the BDB store was faster than the Derby store when I
checked some time back.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi Vinay,
>
> I havent done any performance benchmarking of the Derby store to know
> what a representative num
Hi,
I ran the following test
1) I created 1 Queue
2) Registered 2 consumers to the queue
3) Enqueued 10 messages to the Queue. [ The first enqueued message is long
running. I simulated such that the first message on consumption takes about
50 seconds to be processed]
4) Once the enqueue is commit
Hi Robbie,
I didn't see a case when the broker threw a OOM Exception. It was simply
using my 4GB heap but still functioning.
I see the behavior like you mention of the entire heap getting garbage
collected periodically during my later test. So i think it works very well.
:)
Thanks a lot for your
Hi Robbie,
Thanks for detailed email responses; They really help us in understanding
the internals of qpid; In this and earlier email to Praveen (my co-worker),
I had the sense that you were suggesting that Berkely DB (BDB) persistent
layer was better than Derby. Is that the case?
If yes, what i
Hi Vinay,
I havent done any performance benchmarking of the Derby store to know
what a representative number would actually be, but I will try to take
a look at some point. I havent actually used QpidBench, so can I ask
if there were any specific command(s) you ran so I can try the same
scenarios?
Hi Praveen,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, I havent had time to
actually finish looking at this properly. I did manage to take a
couple of shorter looks at it and believe I have identified some
issues that would a) lead to the broker using more memory at peak than
it ought to need durin
Hamid,
You can get a version of Boost from
http://people.apache.org/~chug/boost-win-1.47/
The tarball files were made with 7zip and unpack well using 7zip.
There are two 64-bit versions, one each compiled with VS2008 and VS2010. Choose
the one you want to use and unpack the files to C:\Boost for
Hi Hamid,
I'd say mid-end November for the 0.14 release. But you can try things out
with the current svn repository content - it's unlikely to change too
much.
To build the kit, go to qpid/packaging/windows and run:
build_installer.bat x86|x64
If cmake can find your Boost, etc. with no problem,
Kerry,
Thank you for sharing your experience. We are pondering about using it in
production.
We are a linux shop so we will mostly avoid the limitations that you mentioned.
Also, we are most likely to code the failover ourselves and point to the
standby broker
when the original fails.
I am worr
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your response. Can you please tell me when the release is
expected? and what steps are required to make a 64-bit release if I want to
try it.
regards,
Hamid.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-qpid-users.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-0-10-64bit-Version-tp
Just a couple notes on Kerry's experience...
- The Windows service capability is in for 0.14.
- The federation capability is not dependent on openais - it can work on
Windows but there's a bug preventing it, and I'm not sure of the nature
of it - it may be simple, maybe not.
-Steve
> -Orig
11 matches
Mail list logo
