Hi,
It is related to having "W f" instead of "W n" (it works the expected
way when having "W n"). I think we're not fully correct when handling
the "n" operator, that one does the handling of the clipping path which
(maybe) should have been done earlier when handling the "W" operator.
(Usuall
Thanks for your answer. I confirm: if I replace "W f" by "W n" in the original
document then the rendering is OK.
Anyway, for me it is strange that the expansion is only in the vertical axis
(and not in the horizontal axis).
I can create a bug report if you want. For my use case I can solve the
On 7/4/2025 4:37 PM, Esteban R wrote:
I can create a bug report if you want.
Yes please do
Tilman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Hello. For the following pdf (which is a simplification of a real life example)
the shading is expanded vertically all the page. Other viewers show a rectangle.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bocFsJbOFAlRijKnBUfSBdQ_GVX3oSUQ/view?usp=drive_link
Is it an issue from pdfbox or maybe it is a probl
On 7/4/2025 4:37 PM, Esteban R wrote:
Anyway, for me it is strange that the expansion is only in the vertical axis
(and not in the horizontal axis).
I'm too lazy to investigate why it goes wrong the way it does, I'm
satisfied that it works properly with a small code segment move 😂
Tilman
for me it is strange that the expansion is only in the vertical axis (and not
in the horizontal axis).
A PDF axial gradient defines a band with gradually changing colors
across the band. If your shading does not extrapolate outside its band,
nothing is drawn at either side of the band. The ban
6 matches
Mail list logo
