I am using the following site to get the latest snapshot:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfbox/3.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
the file here is dated from oct 8th, and it creates the same (bad) pdf
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 7:22 AM Andreas Lehmkühler
wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.
Hi,
I have a document (USPS shipping label) that was created using (what I
believe to be Apache FOP) here:
https://github.com/qzind/tray/files/12458435/Public-Test-Label.pdf
Preview's inspector says:
> "Apache FOP Version 2.3; modified using iText® 5.5.6 ©2000-2015 iText
> Group NV"
- When
Sorry, there was a build problem. (unreliablee plugin) It worked just
now and there's a new file.
Tilman
On 17.10.2023 23:51, Pados Attila wrote:
I am using the following site to get the latest snapshot:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/pdfbox/pdfbox/3.0.1-SNAP
Yes, at 100% the top and bottom lines are missing. It gets better at 150%.
This has happened before with some files that lines are not rendered at
low resolutions, and 100% is 72 dpi. We gave up on fixing that because
it renders properly at higher resolutions.
Tilman
On 18.10.2023 03:02, Tre
>
> We gave up on fixing that because it renders properly at higher
> resolutions.
Hi, can you help you explain what this means? For example, is there an
attribute of the PDF that influences this 72 dpi that you're referring to?
In the case of the document, I would expect it to scale proportiona
IIRC it happened when a line or a very thin shape appeared at the edge
of a clipping region.
It didn't always go away at 150%, sometimes the increase had to be much
higher. I don't know what influence there is.
Tilman
On 18.10.2023 06:46, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
We gave up on fixing that be
6 matches
Mail list logo
