Wednesday, November 8, 2023 2:59 AM
>> To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Re: Little CMS
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>> The Java version I am currently using is corretto-11.0.21, so this is the
>> up-to-date version of Java 11.
>> Is the assu
://github.com/exiftool/exiftool/blob/master/lib/Image/ExifTool/ICC_Profile.pm
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Schlittgen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 2:59 AM
> To: users@pdfbox.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re: Little CMS
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
> The Jav
Maybe a JPEG / JPEG2000 within the PDF? Or some XMP data within the PDF?
Tilman
On 07.11.2023 16:59, Florian Schlittgen wrote:
Thanks for your feedback.
The Java version I am currently using is corretto-11.0.21, so this is the
up-to-date version of Java 11.
Is the assumption correct that the m
I don't think Profile Version 2.3.0 is the LittleCMS version.
At time of writing this, OpenJDK@11.0.21 corretto is at LCMS 2.15 per
https://github.com/corretto/corretto-11/tree/11.0.21.9.1/src/java.desktop/share/native/liblcms/
.
You may also be able to obtain the LCMS version by parsing the "leg
Am Dienstag, dem 07.11.2023 um 16:59 +0100 schrieb Florian Schlittgen:
> Thanks for your feedback.
> The Java version I am currently using is corretto-11.0.21, so this is
> the up-to-date version of Java 11.
> Is the assumption correct that the metadata field 'Profile Version'
> reflects the Little
Thanks for your feedback.
The Java version I am currently using is corretto-11.0.21, so this is the
up-to-date version of Java 11.
Is the assumption correct that the metadata field 'Profile Version' reflects
the Little CMS version?
Kind regards, Florian
> Am 07.11.2023 um 16:34 schrieb sahy...@
LittleCMS is bundled inside Java so the version being used depends on
your Java version and is not something PDFBox provides directly. So if
you are really using LittleCMS 2.3 you have a very old JDK running and
not done any updates to that.
With kind regards
Maruan
Am Dienstag, dem 07.11.2023 um
7 matches
Mail list logo