(Still having trouble with the moderation system)
On 05.12.2024 11:47,
users-reject-1733395642.624288.gahchljpbhdjdocfg...@pdfbox.apache.org wrote:
Hallo. It seems that we have always been wrong to use the pdfbox-app
library: probably we just need the pdfbox-xyx.jar, plus a couple of
other li
There is some trouble with the moderation system, so I'll answer
directly to your next question:
As in our software we already refer to the latest version of Commons
IO, is it possible to also have a distribution without Commons IO
inside the jar?
No, because you don't need pdfbox-app unless f
On 03.12.2024 16:15, Vassallo, Fabio wrote:
I wonder why a copy of the Commons IO classes is inside the
pdfbox-app-xyz.jar, instead of just specifying Commons IO as dependency.
Because it's meant to be used as a stand-alone tool. (well, mostly, see
at the bottom of https://pdfbox.apache.org/3.
Hallo.
I found that the PDFBox distribution contains a copy of the Apache Commons IO
library.
I wonder why a copy of the Commons IO classes is inside the pdfbox-app-xyz.jar,
instead of just specifying Commons IO as dependency.
Thank you in advance,
Fabio Vassallo
Fabio Vassallo
Software Engine
4 matches
Mail list logo
