How do "real" linux distributions handle this?
I would assume we would want to mimic that behavior.
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Owsiany"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2009 12:10:19 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Users] Suggestion for a new pa
This doesn't have to do with openvz directly, although I do use the product
heavily and have noticed the same behavior on my openvz nodes as I do here.
When linux boots up and adds eth1 before eth0 in the `ip link` "order", VEs
show the eth1 IP address as their first hop when doing a traceroute.
OpenVZ, like Virtuozzo, only supports virtualizing linux on linux, or with the
Windows version of Virtuozzo, Windows on Windows.
- Original Message -
From: "mattias"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 5:44:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: SV: [Users] Virt
Did you try just extracting the tar.gz outside of vzctl?
I just downloaded and extracted the debian-4.0-amd64-minimal.tar.gz file with
no errors.
- Original Message -
From: "Herson Esquivel Vargas"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 7:34:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canad
Since installing OpenVZ requires disabling SELinux on the host and all of the
containers share the host's kernel, I don't believe SELinux works in a
container.
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Padro"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 6:46:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Ca
How to disable/remove SELinux within VE ?
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Ralf < r...@amitrader.com > wrote:
>
> On a Debian guest system how can I disable (or completely remove)
> this thing called SELinux?
> I don't need it, it also slows the performance.
Sterli
Are you using venet or veth?
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Miller"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:34:54 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Users] Massive performance degradation
Hi all,
One of the things that I have been tasked with at work i
You need to use veth and bridging to do this.
A quick example would be to create a bridge called br0 and add both a physical
interface (eth0 for example) and a container's veth device to it.
This way your container can utilize DHCP, control it's own routing and
send/receive broadcast/multicas
It may be a kernel bug that was fixed by this patch:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/22/35
Regardless, I wouldn't recommend using the 2.6.22 OpenVZ kernel as it hasn't
been touched since late 2007 and is no longer maintained.
- Original Message -
From: "unni krishnan"
To: users@openvz
Looks like this bug:
http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1198
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Rasch"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 12:28:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Users] checkpoint OpenVZ error
Hello,
unmount /dev/.static/de
Excellent, thanks for pushing another fantastic release out, the OpenVZ project
never ceases to impress!
- Original Message -
From: "Kir Kolyshkin"
To: annou...@openvz.org
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2009 1:57:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Announce] New kernel release: RHE
I am not a dev, but I don't believe there currently exists any patches for >
2.6.27
- Original Message -
From: "Suno Ano"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 5:18:00 AM
Subject: [Users] Re: New kernel vuln...
Is there a patch for 2.6.31 somewhere?
___
Looks like you have some bad memory or potentially even a bad CPU although less
likely.
- Original Message -
From: "SD :: Ventas"
To: m...@dma.org.ua
Cc: users@openvz.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:16:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] What is this on my log???
Reviewing my log i see this:
Can you pastebin the contents of /proc/user_beancounters on the host?
- Original Message -
From: "Tomas Lund"
To: users@openvz.org
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2010 1:40:09 PM
Subject: [Users] Need help configuring memory parameters
Hello,
I recently started using OpenVZ on a new server and
If this is a production machine I'd recommend trying it on a non production
machine first.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Hristo Benev wrote:
>
> Will that work...?
>
> I do not know what functionality is required from kernel and is it
> backported to RHEL kernel.
>
> Maybe I should just bite t
I believe you can already do this with vzctl chkpnt and vzctl restore as
documented here:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Checkpointing_and_live_migration
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>I think it will be very convenient to have a way to
>prepare/
The problem with the lsyncd approach is it doesn't guarantee filesystem
consistency. If you're running a database or any other application in the
container that has open file handles to data that is constantly being
manipulated, the data on the remote host isn't guaranteed to be consistent
at any p
17 matches
Mail list logo
