[Users] Container Live Clone

2014-04-08 Thread Nipun Arora
Hi, I am looking for a functionality similar to "Live Clone"... i.e. I would like to clone an existing running container, such that the clone is a copy of the original. This would be similar to something like live migration without suspending/stopping the original container. Can anyone suggest a

Re: [Users] Container Live Clone

2014-04-11 Thread Nipun Arora
which are running still be running if I restore from the snapshot? Thanks Nipun On Thursday, April 10, 2014, Andrew Vagin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:14:30AM -0400, Nipun Arora wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for a functionality similar to "Live Clone"..

[Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-22 Thread Nipun Arora
Hi All, I was wondering if anyone can suggest what is the most optimal way to do the following 1. Can anyone clarify if ploop is the best layout for minimum suspend time during live migration? 2. I tried migrating a ploop device where I increased the --diskspace to 5G, and found that the suspend

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-22 Thread Nipun Arora
EED) Live migrating container... The following has been used to create the container vzctl create $1 --ostemplate centos-6-x86_64 --config basic --layout ploop Thanks Nipun On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Nipun Arora wrote: > Hi All, > > I was wondering if anyone can suggest what

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-22 Thread Nipun Arora
uring the suspend? > It might also be useful for you to track the size of the dump file. > > Nipun Arora > Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:09 PM > Hi All, > > I was wondering if anyone can suggest what is the most optimal way to do > the following > > 1. Can anyone c

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-23 Thread Nipun Arora
olyshkin wrote: > > On 11/22/2014 09:09 AM, Nipun Arora wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was wondering if anyone can suggest what is the most optimal way to do > the following > > 1. Can anyone clarify if ploop is the best layout for minimum suspend > time during live migra

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-23 Thread Nipun Arora
wrote: > > On 11/23/2014 04:59 AM, Nipun Arora wrote: > > Hi Kir, > > Thanks for the response, I'll update it, and tell you about the results. > > 1. A follow up question... I found that the write I/O speed of 500-1Mbps > increased the suspend time to several minu

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-27 Thread Nipun Arora
quot;0" # CPU fair scheduler parameter CPUUNITS="1000" NETFILTER="stateless" VE_ROOT="/vz/root/101" VE_PRIVATE="/vz/private/101" OSTEMPLATE="centos-6-x86_64" ORIGIN_SAMPLE="basic" HOSTNAME="test" IP_ADDRESS="192.16

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-27 Thread Nipun Arora
Nevermind, I figured it out by changing the fail counters in /proc/user_beans Thanks Nipun On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Nipun Arora wrote: > Thanks, the speed is improved by an order of magnitude :) > > btw. is there any benchmark, that you all have looked into for testing h

[Users] Understanding resource usages in containers

2014-11-28 Thread Nipun Arora
Hi folks, I thought I'd ask this in a different thread to make it easier for people like myself to search for answers through email archives :) I think vswap should be made the "default" in OpenVZ rather than having a complicated way to convert the containers to "vswap containers".Understanding U

Re: [Users] Live Migration Optimal execution

2014-11-28 Thread Nipun Arora
be > secure enough. > > Kir. > > > >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:35 AM, CoolCold wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> I'd recommend set only ram/swap limits (via --ram/--swap) , letting other >>> settings be mostly unlimited (while ram/swap li

Re: [Users] Understanding resource usages in containers

2014-12-01 Thread Nipun Arora
Thanks.. This explanation is very useful Nipun On Friday, November 28, 2014, Kevin Holly [Fusl] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/28/2014 03:47 PM, Nipun Arora wrote: > > Hi folks, > Hi Nipun! > > > 1. --cpu-limit puts a limit on