Definitely we'll not migrate to Proxmox because it's suboptimal writing
this in OpenDocument format from an HTML5 interface.
El 28/4/19 a les 14:37, spameden ha escrit:
> No. It's impossible to use OpenVZ 6 with kernel 4.x, unless you put lots
> of effort to port their patches over the fresh kern
Yes, these are the right comparisons:
OpenVZ vs LXC
Virtuozzo distro vs Proxmox distro
CentOS vs Debian vs Other general purpose distros
+ Interesting to know the support to run OpenVZ 7 on CentOS.
It should be documented at OpenVZ wiki!
El 29/4/19 a les 4:16, Website Solution - George ha escri
I apologize for the duplicate message. I forgot that I had already sent a
message before.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:52 AM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT <
pauloco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why suggest LXC when we have OpenVZ 7? LXC is far behind, it has less
> features, it's more insecure, has a network st
Why suggest LXC when we have OpenVZ 7? LXC is far behind, it has less
features, it's more insecure, has a network standard that is a nightmare,
etc.
I stopped using proxmox from the exact moment it removed OpenVZ support and
replaced it with LXC.
Now a happy customer with Virtuozzo 7 (the same as
My 2 cents.
*OpenVZ vs LXC*
OpenVZ requires a patched kernel, but it's finally updated with OVZ7
OpenVZ is gradually porting its technology to mainline Linux kernel
OpenVZ has a more battle tested OS virtualization technology
LXC is still more insecure
LXC has a more complex way to configure netwo
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:53 PM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT
wrote:
> Why suggest LXC when we have OpenVZ 7? LXC is far behind, it has less
> features, it's more insecure, has a network standard that is a nightmare,
> etc.
>
As some members of this maillist mentioned, not everyone wants to change
into
