Re: [Users] Performance degradation on 042stab113.X

2016-03-29 Thread Vasily Averin
Dear Karl, no, we know nothing about possible performance degradation between 042stab108.x and 042stab113.x kernels. High load average and CPU peaks are not a problems per se, it can be caused by increased activity on your nodes. Could you please explain in more details, why you believe you ha

Re: [Users] Performance degradation on 042stab113.X

2016-03-29 Thread Karl Johnson
Hi Vasily, Every weekend I do backups of all CT which take a lot of IO. It didn't affect much load average before 108 but as soon as I upgraded to 113, load got very high and nodes became sluggish during backups. It might be something else but I was looking for feedback if someone else had the sam

Re: [Users] Performance degradation on 042stab113.X

2016-03-29 Thread Gena Makhomed
On 29.03.2016 21:03, Karl Johnson wrote: Every weekend I do backups of all CT which take a lot of IO. It didn't affect much load average before 108 but as soon as I upgraded to 113, load got very high and nodes became sluggish during backups. It might be something else but I was looking for feed

Re: [Users] Performance degradation on 042stab113.X

2016-03-29 Thread Karl Johnson
Disks are fine and RAID is optimal. It doesn't happen only when backups run but it's easier to see during this time. What's strange is that there were no issue on <108 kernels. It could have been this following patch from RedHat but 113 isn't based on 2.6.32-573.22.1, 114 will be I think. ** Due