Re: [Users] ZFS vs ploop

2015-07-23 Thread Сергей Мамонов
>1. creating then removing data (vzctl compact takes care of that) >So, #1 is solved Only partially in fact. 1. Compact "eat" a lot of resources, because of the heavy use of the disk. 2. You need compact your ploop very very regulary. On our nodes, when we run compact every day, with 3-5T /vz/ d

Re: [Users] ZFS vs ploop

2015-07-23 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
On 07/22/2015 11:59 PM, Сергей Мамонов wrote: >1. creating then removing data (vzctl compact takes care of that) >So, #1 is solved Only partially in fact. 1. Compact "eat"a lot of resources, because of the heavy use of the disk. 2. You need compact your ploop very very regulary. On our nodes, w

Re: [Users] ZFS vs ploop

2015-07-23 Thread Сергей Мамонов
And many added to bugzilla. And many already fixed from you and other guys from OpenVZ team. But the all picture, unfortunately, it has not changed cardinally, yet. Some people afraid use it, yet. PS And suspend container failed without iptables-save since 2007 year ) https://bugzilla.openvz.org/s

Re: [Users] ZFS vs ploop

2015-07-23 Thread Сергей Мамонов
26G used is CTID and 43G root.hdd after vzctl compact are not the expected behavior or not? Try to report it? About big load to disks - I not seem what we can do with it, it look like expected behavior for compact, unfortunatly. Why you are ignoring my arguments about ext4? It's filesystem from t

[Users] https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2470

2015-07-23 Thread Gena Makhomed
On 23.07.2015 5:44, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: 1) currently even suspend/resume not work reliable: https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2470 - I can't suspend and resume containers without bugs. and as result - I also can't use it for live migration. Valid point, we need to figure it out. Wha

Re: [Users] SIMFS users

2015-07-23 Thread Nick Knutov
Yes. There are number of cases when use of ploop is bad idea. Large part of them is already mentioned in list. For example I can use ploop only for small CTs (less then 5-10 GB) as ploop disadvantages like image size (even compacted) is not critical in this case. 21.07.2015 12:21, Sergey Bronni

Re: [Users] ZFS vs ploop

2015-07-23 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
On 22 July 2015 at 19:44, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > > Next thing, you can actually use shared base deltas for containers, and > although it is not > enabled by default, but quite possible and works in practice. The key is > to create a base delta > and use it for multiple containers (via hardlinks).

[Users] Show stopper while trying out Openvz 7 beta 1

2015-07-23 Thread jjs - mainphrame
Hello, it appears the bugzilla is not accepting bug reports for openvz 7 yet - at least there was no option to select rhel/centos 7 as the platform. At any rate, when I googled the error, I found several people asking about this show stopper, but nobody answering. Any pointers as to what I can tr

Re: [Users] ZFS vs ploop

2015-07-23 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
On 07/23/2015 06:22 AM, Сергей Мамонов wrote: And many added to bugzilla. And many already fixed from you and other guys from OpenVZ team. But the all picture, unfortunately, it has not changed cardinally, yet. Some people afraid use it, yet. PS And suspend container failed without iptables-