Hello, all!
Thank you for feedback!
Kirill, you are absolutely right and this issue mentioned in my
comparison table
https://github.com/pavel-odintsov/OpenVZ_ZFS/blob/master/OpenVZ_containers_on_zfs_filesystem.md
But there are some progress at this field there
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/i
Hello!
I can't find any info about linking :(
But I found big article from ZoL team:
http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue
Will be fine if OpenVZ command can add ZFS into standard shipment :)
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>> License issues of ZFS.
Greetings,
- Original Message -
> > License issues of ZFS.
> >
> > License issues is not an critical because installing of ZFS is
> > straightforward and do not require any deep integration to system or
> > kernel and work on almost any kernel.
>
> OpenZFS and zfsonline people claim that
> Unless I misunderstood, they also say there that ZFS code can be merged into
> the Linux source tree... but that distributing a binary built from it would be
> a no-no.
They claim distributing as binary module is no problem! They have split the code
into spl (Solaris porting Layer), and a sepa
> I know Proxmox is a huge Debian fan... does Debian offer ZFS kernel modules
> and if not, why not? How about Proxmox VE?
Besides, I would like to improve support for more storage types on OpenVZ.
I think direct support for zfs, rbd, dm-thin would be great (snaphshot, clone).
But for me the cur
