Hello James,
[big snip]
On 2014-12-28, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> The goal is to reduce the size of the patch that has to be applied, but
> even if the patch diff reaches zero, we'd still have to build the
> supported kernel for you because supporting what someone else builds
> becomes a massive
Very interesting!
So, after reading this, I installed vzctl-core on my fedora 21 box, from
the stock repositories, and just for giggles, I issued the command "vzctl
create 101".
It did the right thing and created a default Centos 6 container.
However, I immediately noticed that the vzlist comman
Greetings,
- Original Message -
> So, after reading this, I installed vzctl-core on my fedora 21 box,
> from the stock repositories, and just for giggles, I issued the
> command "vzctl create 101".
>
> It did the right thing and created a default Centos 6 container.
>
> However, I immedi
Thanks for the reference, it's good to know. My vz adventures in the past
always involved the full openvz stack. So running vz containers does indeed
appear to be mainly of academic interest until further down the road...
On Dec 31, 2014 1:06 PM, "Scott Dowdle" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> - Origi
Correction, what I meant to say is that running vz container *on a stock
distro kernel* is mainly academic for now. Obviously, running containers on
the openvz kernel works quite well!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:15 PM, jjs - mainphrame
wrote:
> Thanks for the reference, it's good to know. My vz a
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 13:58 -0700, Scott Dowdle wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> - Original Message -
> > So, after reading this, I installed vzctl-core on my fedora 21 box,
> > from the stock repositories, and just for giggles, I issued the
> > command "vzctl create 101".
> >
> > It did the right
