Yes,
# accton on
Turning on process accounting, file set to the default
'/var/log/account/pacct'.
accton: Operation not permitted
Is it possible to write patch to support this or it's impossible at all
because of some limitation of OpenVZ?
Thorsten Schifferdecker пишет:
Hi Nick,
Nick Knu
Philipp Wehrheim wrote:
Hey,
the attached patch fixes an issue where vzctl overwrites the symlink
to CTs config.
For the sake of people reading this thread. The issue is a subject of
bug #1270 [1]
and it was already fixed in GIT [2]. Will be available in vzctl-3.0.24
(to be released
this y
Nick Knutov wrote:
Yes,
# accton on
Turning on process accounting, file set to the default
'/var/log/account/pacct'.
accton: Operation not permitted
Is it possible to write patch to support this or it's impossible at
all because of some limitation of OpenVZ?
Please file an enhancement req
Daniel Lüdeking wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know whether bug#862 [1] and/or surpressing warnings to
stderr is to be solved in vzlist, too?
I'm not quite familiar with the openvz community and development
activities so I'm afraid to ask who is responsible for the tool vzlist?
Those warnings
frank wrote:
Hi,
recently we have had problems because a log file has filled all disk
space inside a VE.
To prevent this, it would be good to have a separate filesystem for
log files.
IMHO the proper solution is to have a separate user account for logging,
and a disk
quota for that user. Thi
Hi,
are there any plans to support Linux 2.6.31 (or even 2.6.32)?
I heard that quite a few features provided by OpenVZ (containers, net
namespaces) are now in mainline (well, not the original OpenVZ code, but
stuff developed from scratch) and I'd like to know if vzctl can be used
to control these
Hi,
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> are there any plans to support Linux 2.6.31 (or even 2.6.32)?
> I heard that quite a few features provided by OpenVZ (containers, net
> namespaces) are now in mainline (well, not the original OpenVZ code, but
> stuff developed from scratch) and I'd li
Hi,
On 09.11.2009 19:03, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger schrieb:
>
>> are there any plans to support Linux 2.6.31 (or even 2.6.32)?
>> I heard that quite a few features provided by OpenVZ (containers, net
>> namespaces) are now in mainline (well, not the original OpenVZ
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:03:15PM +0100, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> > are there any plans to support Linux 2.6.31 (or even 2.6.32)?
>
> ... 2.6.32 ... see more
> http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msg&th=8077&start=0&;
Most of us don't really need .32, but supporting .27 would be good.
It
