Re: [Users] Panic booting 2.6.32-042stab108.2 on Centos 6.

2015-06-08 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
On 06/07/2015 11:58 PM, Rene C. wrote: Ok, done. I noticed in grub.conf that unlike all the previous kernel entries, stab108.2 doesn't have any initrd line - is that normal? No it is not. Maybe you want to file a separate bug for that. In general there's no need to do full kernel reinstall

Re: [Users] Panic booting 2.6.32-042stab108.2 on Centos 6.

2015-06-08 Thread Rene C.
Ok, done. I noticed in grub.conf that unlike all the previous kernel entries, stab108.2 doesn't have any initrd line - is that normal? Is it worth trying to rollback and redo the update? Is it safe to run 'yum remove 2.6.32-042stab108.2'? I mean, there seems to be only one version of vzkernel-fi

Re: [Users] Panic booting 2.6.32-042stab108.2 on Centos 6.

2015-06-07 Thread Sergey Bronnikov
On 15:38 Sun 07 Jun , Rene C. wrote: > Sure, where do I find that? https://openvz.org/Remote_console_setup http://openvz.org/Reporting_OpenVZ_problem http://openvz.org/When_you_have_an_oops > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Could you sumbit a bug to Ope

Re: [Users] Panic booting 2.6.32-042stab108.2 on Centos 6.

2015-06-07 Thread Rene C.
Sure, where do I find that? On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > Hi > > Could you sumbit a bug to OpenVZ bugzilla > and post there call trace? > > On 14:57 Sun 07 Jun , Rene C. wrote: > > Just routinely updated openvz ('yum update' + reboot) but it ended up in > a > > frozen

Re: [Users] Panic booting 2.6.32-042stab108.2 on Centos 6.

2015-06-07 Thread Sergey Bronnikov
Hi Could you sumbit a bug to OpenVZ bugzilla and post there call trace? On 14:57 Sun 07 Jun , Rene C. wrote: > Just routinely updated openvz ('yum update' + reboot) but it ended up in a > frozen panic. Through KVM I was able to load the previous kernel > (2.6.32-042stab102.9) > > I didn't notic