2012/3/14 Andrew Vagin
> On 03/14/2012 11:26 AM, Maoke wrote:
>
>> yes but we still have other troubles with the 2.6.32-042stab044.11. :P so
>> we are trying to understand the problem first.
>>
> I don't suggest to move on 2.6.32 kernel. I said about
> 2.6.18-028stabXXX.Y. You can find a last sta
On 03/14/2012 11:26 AM, Maoke wrote:
yes but we still have other troubles with the 2.6.32-042stab044.11. :P
so we are trying to understand the problem first.
I don't suggest to move on 2.6.32 kernel. I said about
2.6.18-028stabXXX.Y. You can find a last stable 2.6.18 kernel here:
http://downloa
yes but we still have other troubles with the 2.6.32-042stab044.11. :P so
we are trying to understand the problem first. - maoke
2012/3/14 Andrew Vagin
> 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6xen is a very old version. Could you update
> it?
>
>
> On 03/14/2012 10:28 AM, Maoke wrote:
>
>> sorry if this
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6xen is a very old version. Could you
update it?
On 03/14/2012 10:28 AM, Maoke wrote:
sorry if this is more of a Xen problem.
we are running openvz in Xen PVs (kernel
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6xen), and occasionally the network of a
PV, as well as the PV's
sorry if this is more of a Xen problem.
we are running openvz in Xen PVs (kernel
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6xen), and occasionally the network of a PV,
as well as the PV's hosted containers, at a virtual interface is lost.
sometimes restarting the network can solve the problem but in most case
