On 2013-08-02 3:16 PM Dave.Mainwaring wrote:
What was that company that used to used to compete with OO? Micro
something
--
Do you have a real question or are you just posting your spam links?
--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: ht
Le 02/08/2013 14:05, Urmas a écrit :
...Except the Linux version does use dictionaries from a filesystem directory,
while the Windows one doesn't.
It depends on how you install it. If you install from the debs (as I always
do), then it's the same as under Windows.
I use AOO at work on Window
What was that company that used to used to compete with OO? Micro
something
--
http://tinyurl.com/cx6bbng
http://tinyurl.com/kmjaygo
--
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Urmas wrote:
>> "Rob Weir":
>>
>> In what way do you think this is tru
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Urmas wrote:
> "Rob Weir":
>
> In what way do you think this is true?
>
> Bugs/features affecting Windows integration or performance are overlooked,
> sometimes for 2–3 years. Compatibility and interaction with Windows-only
> software is ridiculed.
>
There are old
"Andrea Pescetti":
Dictionaries are exactly the same on all platforms.
...Except the Linux version does use dictionaries from a filesystem
directory, while the Windows one doesn't.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
Urmas wrote:
Those ones affecting Linux get more attention.
The 4.0.0 release was delayed to fix one specific bug, that only
affected Windows 8 systems.
My pet peeve is the terrible work with dictionaries in Windows version
which makes me use a Linux VM just to proofread documents.
Dictio
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:12:19 +0700
"Urmas" wrote:
> "Rob Weir":
> In what way do you think this is true?
>
> Bugs/features affecting Windows integration or performance are overlooked,
> sometimes for 2–3 years. Compatibility and interaction with Windows-only
> software is ridiculed.
>
> Those
Yes, you're right, there is a lot that could be improved but keep in mind that
Oracle hasn't done anything to improve the product.
I have a lot of respect for the hard work these volunteers do.
Sent from my iPad
On 02/08/2013, at 8:12 PM, "Urmas" wrote:
> "Rob Weir":
> In what way do you thin
"Rob Weir":
In what way do you think this is true?
Bugs/features affecting Windows integration or performance are overlooked,
sometimes for 2–3 years. Compatibility and interaction with Windows-only
software is ridiculed.
Those ones affecting Linux get more attention. It gives a clear message
JB wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:33:56 +0700
> "Urmas" wrote:
>
>> And yet the *OO developers treat Windows users as a second-class
citizens.
>>
>
> You can't possibly be serious!
>
> I guess it had to happen sometime - someone, somewhere would find
*something* to
> whine about.
>
>
That U
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:33:56 +0700
"Urmas" wrote:
> And yet the *OO developers treat Windows users as a second-class citizens.
>
You can't possibly be serious!
I guess it had to happen sometime - someone, somewhere would find *something*
to
whine about.
--
“Those who suppress freedom
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Urmas wrote:
> And yet the *OO developers treat Windows users as a second-class citizens.
>
In what way do you think this is true?
-Rob
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoff
And yet the *OO developers treat Windows users as a second-class citizens.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
We released AOO 4.0 on July 23nd, mid-day UTC. We only have summary
data for full days, so the following is really for 6.5 days of AOO
4.0, through July 29th.
1,257,653 total downloads (full installs, not including langpacks).
In comparison, the 1st 7 days of AOO 3.4.0 saw around 750K downloads,
14 matches
Mail list logo
