2014-05-16 20:38 GMT+02:00 japples :
> Does a list exist for OO users to vote for proposed future
> functionalities? I would like to vote for Reveal Codes.
>
> Reveal Codes is a very useful tool. It works independently of the "Style
> rules" and does not require the user to take time to search "
I agree with the "On the spot" need. Quite simply, Reveal Codes allows me
to see what's going with a glance.
With so many features, the interaction between them can make formatting
unexpectedly difficult.
Like salt and pepper, use when needed!
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Richard Detwiler
Peter Johansson wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It is a purely technical choice we had to make to take advantage of 64-bit
Mac OS X applications and avoid the dependency on now deprecated build
tools. It was discussed at length on the dev list, since it was clear t
art...@aol.com writes:
> Dear Ms/Mr? Carson, (at car...@wistly.net)
It's mister, for the record. "Carson" is a name of Norse origin from
the words for "marsh" and "son." You'd think that with the word "son"
actually in it, people would only use it for boys, but this turns out
not to be the case
On 16/05/2014 japples wrote:
Does a list exist for OO users to vote for proposed future
functionalities? I would like to vote for Reveal Codes.
The link I've already sent
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
is all we have, but it has this functionality. You can vote, you can
co
What I don't understand, and I'm sure I must be missing something so
please explain, is how come this discussion seems to suggest that it's
either/or -- meaning, "use styles for all formatting" or "we HAVE to
have "reveal codes" to not use styles".
I've used styles a lot with Open Office and I
On Sat, 17 May 2014 00:18:32 -0700
Bruce Byfield wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2014 12:32:43 AM Doug wrote:
>
> > My beef is that when you find something weird happening, it's likely to
> > be because of some "style" that you weren't aware of, and _you can't fix
> > it, because__
> > __it's built
On Saturday 17 May 2014 12:32:43 AM Doug wrote:
> My beef is that when you find something weird happening, it's likely to
> be because of some "style" that you weren't aware of, and _you can't fix
> it, because__
> __it's built into the "style." _
Are your experiences with styles with someone e
> On 05/16/2014 03:12 AM, mt wrote:
> > To those who chimed in to justify styles: it is quite obvious to me
> > that you are missing the point. For starters, it sounds like you don't
> > really know WordPerfect, and imagine "Reveal codes" to be something
> > other than it was.
In my case, what i
please dont send me emails any more. I am a particular person.
Le 17 mai 2014 à 05:24, Bruce Byfield a écrit :
> On Friday 16 May 2014 10:28:44 PM Julian Thomas wrote:
>>> But more basically, OpenOffice is for people like Julian and me. If people
>>> like me and Julian put forward a suggestion,
On Friday 16 May 2014 11:35:46 PM James Knott wrote:
> On 05/16/2014 09:29 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
> > If people don't want to learn how to use Writer the way it was designed,
> > they might be better off with some simpler tool.
>
> Notepad? ;-)
:-)
But I didn't say that to put anyone down.
11 matches
Mail list logo
