On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Note: it doesn't work with OpenOffice 4 yet, see last comment. But the
> source code should be in the OpenOffice repository, so it's available to
> anybody who wants to take a look.
Thanks Andrea.
I remember trying this one back in the 2.
Fernando Cassia wrote:
So, is there a plugin allowing to use AOO to edit wiki articles (including
tables), and pushing changes back on-line effortlessly?
Like this?
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/sun-wiki-publisher
Note: it doesn't work with OpenOffice 4 yet, see last comment. But
As a predominately Linux user of AOO, I can say that it is generally very good
- I think I may have had a couple crashes with the 4.0 version, but I honestly
can't remember.
I much prefer AOO over LO. The only place I have had issues with the
AndroOpenOffice port for Android which while coming
FOSS usually means Free and Open Source Software.
FUD usually means Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (or Disinformation).
Maurice Howe (a happy AOO user)
-Original Message-
From: Scooter [mailto:scoo...@scootersdesk.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:43 AM
To: users@openoffice.apac
Hi Scooter,
Actually Fernando was reporting on what others had said, not stating his
opinion. Just to clear that up for you.
I hope you continue to enjoy your experience with AOO.
//drew
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Scooter wrote:
> Good Morning Group,
>
> I'm a bit confused. What is FO
Good Morning Group,
I'm a bit confused. What is FOSS & FUD and why would any of us think
"Open Office is pretty much only a memory" (per Mr Cassia).? I join Mr.
Davis' opinion. I tried LibreOffice (LO) not knowing about Apache Open
Office (AOO), and didn't like LO. It was too different from OO
LibreOffice is a pile of crapware in my experience. Q.C. seems to be
missing in action! OpenOffice has always done what I need to get done
without irritating the daylights out of me.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> (and MySQL too, and probably the same that would l
