> On Sep 6, 2021, at 2:15 PM, Will Hartung wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Scott Palmer wrote:
>>
>> The easiest way to get JavaFX working smoothly is to use a JDK that has
>> JavaFX modules built-in. Azul and BellSoft provide such installs of Open
>> JDK as free downloads. They
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Scott Palmer wrote:
>
> The easiest way to get JavaFX working smoothly is to use a JDK that has
> JavaFX modules built-in. Azul and BellSoft provide such installs of Open
> JDK as free downloads. They make development with JavaFX simpler, I
> recommend them.
>
Th
> On Sep 5, 2021, at 1:15 AM, Will Hartung wrote:
>
> You don't want to use a generic Maven Java project.
>
> You should use either "FXML JavaFX Maven Archetype (Gluon)" or "Simple JavaFX
> Maven Archetype (Gluon)"
>
> It takes more than simply adding dependencies to get JavaFX to work, and
You may find this video helpful.
https://youtu.be/L5fRigcRqGY
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 06:04 Zulfi Khan, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am able to run: FXMLJavaFXMaven Archetype and SimpleJavaFXMavenArchetype
> provided by Natebeans 12.4. Now I created the application using following
> steps:
>
>
> File-→NewP
You don't want to use a generic Maven Java project.
You should use either "FXML JavaFX Maven Archetype (Gluon)" or "Simple
JavaFX Maven Archetype (Gluon)"
It takes more than simply adding dependencies to get JavaFX to work, and
these two projects tweak the pom.xml file appropriately.
Regards,
W
Hi,
I am able to run:FXMLJavaFXMaven Archetype and SimpleJavaFXMavenArchetype
provided byNatebeans 12.4. Now I created the application using following steps:
File-→NewProject-→Java with Maven and Java Application-→ProjectName(JavaFx2)
and thenI right clicked on javafx2 from the project
l
