Re: using assembly to repackage a war

2005-10-25 Thread Mikael Wikström
jerome lacoste wrote: >On 10/22/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>If they are never used independantly I'd say merge, otherwise I'd say >>fix the war plugin, merge the 2 web.xml's, and add that as the >>resulting one. >> >> > >OK. > >My idea is that there shouldn't be any mer

Re: using assembly to repackage a war

2005-10-24 Thread jerome lacoste
On 10/22/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If they are never used independantly I'd say merge, otherwise I'd say > fix the war plugin, merge the 2 web.xml's, and add that as the > resulting one. OK. My idea is that there shouldn't be any merging of xml files to do. The war would just

Re: using assembly to repackage a war

2005-10-21 Thread Brett Porter
If they are never used independantly I'd say merge, otherwise I'd say fix the war plugin, merge the 2 web.xml's, and add that as the resulting one. - Brett On 10/21/05, jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to take a war and add some packages in certain places. > > I took the approac

using assembly to repackage a war

2005-10-21 Thread jerome lacoste
I need to take a war and add some packages in certain places. I took the approach of using the assembly plugin to repackage the war. I.e. I have now 2 projects A & B, A packages the war, B takes the war and a couple of zip files as dependencies, and assemble the whole. It fails miserably because