"fault". More a "missing
feature".
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789917.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
know how a smart solution is to be
> build.
> AND I know that Maven is not the bad guy here, but it is our own laziness,
> as we could simply write such a workflow! :-)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-modu
not the bad guy here, but it is our own laziness,
as we could simply write such a workflow! :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789830.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list a
he needed artifact is
> provided, as I am invoking the build helper's plugin's attach-artifact goal
> which does nothing else but tell Maven exactly that!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p
is message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789704.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apac
ust a need for partial
> serialization. I mean, I can even fix it by hand (merging two poms in one
> and all works fine, as the executions run top to bottom), so it MUST be
> possible to do just this partial fix in Maven core.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789696.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apac
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:32 AM, mkarg wrote:
> This is weird. I mean, the POM contains all the information Maven needes to
> understand that e. g. a MVN test on the dependent module implies an (at
> least) MVN package on the dependency side. Otherwise the relationship
> provided in this multi-mo
simply acting in a logical way and package the dependency even when the
invocation just enforced a MVN test? That would do not harm and it would
make everything work as one expects.
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789681
Le 24 mars 2014 12:19, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> >
>>
>> There is one multi-module project where module 1 is dependend on module
2.
>> Module 1 uses assembly plugin in the package phase to produce the final
>> artifact (zip file). Modul 2 uses dependency plugin in the
generat
"misunderstanding"? How shall this work
> without pack and unpack?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789409.html
> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
&
at is "strange" or a "misunderstanding"? How shall this work
without pack and unpack?
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365p5789409.html
Sent from the Maven -
Hi,
>
There is one multi-module project where module 1 is dependend on module 2.
Module 1 uses assembly plugin in the package phase to produce the final
artifact (zip file). Modul 2 uses dependency plugin in the generate-source
phase to unpack that artifact (zip file).
Using dependency plugin
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:40 AM, mkarg wrote:
> We started using multi-module project for the first time and notice strange
> behaviour. We hope that some experienced user can tell us how to proceed.
>
> There is one multi-module project where module 1 is dependend on module 2.
> Module 1 uses as
context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/multi-module-phases-sequence-tp5789365.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands
15 matches
Mail list logo
