>> > Should I better specify the exact dependencies and investigate some
>> > more work in POM maintainance? What would this gain me?
>>
>> You answered your own question, congrats! :)
>
> Well, if I got you right, you mean it won't gain me anything. Right?
I made no such statement. I was simply a
Hi!
Thanks for your answers so far.
Am Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:17:22 -0600 schrieb Wayne Fay :
> > Should I better specify the exact dependencies and investigate some
> > more work in POM maintainance? What would this gain me?
>
> You answered your own question, congrats! :)
Well, if I got you righ
> Should I better specify the exact dependencies and investigate some more
> work in POM maintainance? What would this gain me?
You answered your own question, congrats! :)
Wayne
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven
ntroduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Importing_Dependencies
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Hoeller [mailto:mar...@xss.co.at]
> Sent: 7. helmikuuta 2014 11:33
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Best practices for Java EE 7 dependencies
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm wonderi
-
From: Martin Hoeller [mailto:mar...@xss.co.at]
Sent: 7. helmikuuta 2014 11:33
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Best practices for Java EE 7 dependencies
Hi!
I'm wondering what the best practices are for specifying Java EE 7
dependencies in my modules.
There is the so called BOM (bill of mate
Hi!
I'm wondering what the best practices are for specifying Java EE 7
dependencies in my modules.
There is the so called BOM (bill of materials) POM: javax:javaee-api:7.0
which lists all API submodules required for JEE7. Specifying this in my
module as
javax
javaee-api
7.0
wo
