Could anyone tell me, is it an expected behaviour, and is it an issue
in Javadoc (I think it worth documenting), or the second configuration
should be treated as invalid?
--
Alexander Bubenchikov
JetBrains
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
/maven/cli/MavenCli.java#L276-L288
>
> Cheers
> Tibor17
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:39 PM Alexander Bubenchikov <
> alexander.bubenchi...@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stuart
> > E.g.
> >
> https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob
ution.rmi.RemoteUtil$1$1.invoke(RemoteUtil.java:153)
> >> > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy216.customize(Unknown Source)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.MavenEmbedderWrapper.doCustomize(MavenEmbedderWrapper.java:92)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.MavenEmbedderWrapper.onWrappeeCreated(MavenEmbedderWrapper.java:45)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.RemoteObjectWrapper.getOrCreateWrappee(RemoteObjectWrapper.java:42)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.MavenEmbedderWrapper.doCustomize(MavenEmbedderWrapper.java:92)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.MavenEmbedderWrapper.lambda$customizeForResolve$1(MavenEmbedderWrapper.java:65)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.RemoteObjectWrapper.perform(RemoteObjectWrapper.java:76)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.server.MavenEmbedderWrapper.customizeForResolve(MavenEmbedderWrapper.java:64)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.project.MavenProjectsTree.resolve(MavenProjectsTree.java:1261)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.project.MavenProjectsProcessorResolvingTask.perform(MavenProjectsProcessorResolvingTask.java:45)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.project.MavenProjectsProcessor.doProcessPendingTasks(MavenProjectsProcessor.java:140)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.project.MavenProjectsProcessor.access$000(MavenProjectsProcessor.java:33)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.project.MavenProjectsProcessor$2.run(MavenProjectsProcessor.java:114)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> org.jetbrains.idea.maven.utils.MavenUtil.lambda$runInBackground$5(MavenUtil.java:468)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl$1.run(ApplicationImpl.java:294)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
> >> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> >> > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> >>
> >>
>
--
Alexander Bubenchikov
Software developer
JetBrains
http://www.jetbrains.com
The Drive to Develop
original component in core (assuming that they have the same JSR330 name or
> Plexus hint)
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 11:46, Alexander Bubenchikov <
> alexander.bubenchi...@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Enrico, my name is Alex, I've joined to Jetbrains this year and
