Hi all,
I recently saw the jfokus talk on maven 4 and heard the desire for more people
to try it out and report back, so here goes. I tried RC2 and RC3 on an open
source project I maintain (https://github.com/soartech/jsoar) and ran into two
issues (note this works fine with maven 3.9.8, which
Hello,
With Maven 3.9.9 I’m using a command like this to find the version of a project
on the command line:
❯ mvn3 help:evaluate --quiet -DforceStdout=true -Dexpression=project.version
Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e76f7d015ee5ec7bfcdc97d260186937)
Maven home: /opt/local/share/java/maven3
Java ve
I was able to replace file://${project.baseUri} with ${project.basedir} and it
worked. Still not clear if/why baseUri isn't allowed here, but not a big deal
for me. Also, a very minor nit, but "basedir" isn't camelCase like baseUri and
rootDirectory (and the "dir" vs. "Directory" inconsistency).
Release Notes – Maven 4.0.0-rc-3
The Apache Maven team would like to announce the release of Maven 4.0.0-rc-3.
Please find the HTML version of this email at
https://maven.apache.org/docs/4.0.0-rc-3/release-notes.html
Maven 4 release requires Java 17 for runtime.
This is release candidate rel
> On 10 Mar 2025, at 10:38, Arbol One wrote:
>
> AI apps like DeepSeek is also providing good information regarding Apache
> Maven PDF.
Which is logical, as GenAI is typically repeating the past, rather than
preparing for the future.
---
AI apps like DeepSeek is also providing good information regarding
Apache Maven PDF.
On 2025-03-08 8:36 a.m., Eric Bresie wrote:
Not a user and not voting but…
Looking on Stack Overflow…there are still questions being asked does that
not imply there are still users outside of this mailing lis
Now that Apache Maven PDF is retired, what other option do we have?
Thanks!!!
On 2025-03-08 8:53 a.m., Eric Bresie wrote:
May be moot at this time bug figured I’d chime in in this thread
I think the mailing list may represent a small group of stakeholders but
may not truly reflect actual user
