Scaling Marmotta's LDP interface

2015-09-18 Thread Mark Breedlove
grateful for any feedback that you might have that would assist us with handling large volumes of data over LDP. Thanks for your help! - Mark Breedlove and Tom Johnson, Digital Public Library of America (http://dp.la/) t...@dp.la [1] https://digitalpubliclibraryofamerica.atlassian.net/wiki

Re: Scaling Marmotta's LDP interface

2015-09-23 Thread Mark Breedlove
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > take into account that by default PostgreSQL is very very conservative. > Have you customized it? > Thanks for your help with this! Yes, we've done quite a bit of tuning, as described in [1], [3], and [4]. * max_connections: default

Re: Scaling Marmotta's LDP interface

2015-09-25 Thread Mark Breedlove
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > From my experience Postgres takes as much as it can, but never risking the > system. We normally also use 40% as orientative figure. But with such small > server I'd try to give it more memory (6GB?) to see how it behaves. > OK. I'll

Re: Scaling Marmotta's LDP interface

2015-10-02 Thread Mark Breedlove
eport back when we've run the full range of our processes. (Including processes that do more inserts updates.) On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Mark Breedlove wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > >> >> From my experience Postgr