Could be in the database...?
I guess you'd need to run your queries attaching a profiler (e.g., YourKit)
to see find our where the issue is.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Bohms, H.M. (Michel)
wrote:
> Dear all
>
>
>
> We increases all memory sizes but still we get errors with sparql insert
>
Dear all
We increases all memory sizes but still we get errors with sparql insert near
100Kany tip welcome!
Michel
Last week Erwin, Jack and I did some tests with large data. And it seems that
the problem related to the memory has gone: Currently we can send in a one big
message 90K o
