Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Jaime Melis writes: >> Hmm, writing the question seems to gives my answer, it looks like the >> cherry-picking of master commits on the one- branches are the >> reasons of the merge conflicts. >> > > Yes... that's the way we usually do it: by cherry picking the commits. Ok, I'll broke everything

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-17 Thread Jaime Melis
Hi, Should I rebase[2] all my branches on master directly and then follow > the OpenNebula releases or is there a path to merge master and one-4.10? > > > Hmm, writing the question seems to gives my answer, it looks like the > cherry-picking of master commits on the one- branches are the > reasons

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-17 Thread Jaime Melis
Hello Alberto, yes, of course. But due to resources we can only try and help out people from the community like yourself or Daniel who want to collaborate in creating these packages. We can assist and try to change this around in the codebase to make things easier for package maintainers. On Tue,

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Jaime Melis writes: > Hi Alberto, > > I can confirm what Daniel said. We have no current plans of updating the > offical Debian package of OpenNebula. Debian packaing guidelines are very > strict and as Daniel mentioned it's a very big job. > > Daniel, I apologize, but somehow I was not aware of

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-17 Thread Alberto Zuin - Liste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jamie and Daniel, I perfectly understand the problems with Debian official packaging guidelines. I asked this, because at the moment I'm collaborating with Devuan, an upcoming Debian fork which is aimed to not have systemd mandatory. Could be intere

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-17 Thread Jaime Melis
Hi Alberto, I can confirm what Daniel said. We have no current plans of updating the offical Debian package of OpenNebula. Debian packaing guidelines are very strict and as Daniel mentioned it's a very big job. Daniel, I apologize, but somehow I was not aware of #3129. I will update the ticket no

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-13 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Daniel Dehennin writes: [...] > It's a big work, for now lintian is far from being happy[3] [...] > [3] c.f. attachement Missing attachement, sorry. -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF

Re: [one-users] "Official" Debian packages

2015-02-13 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Alberto Zuin - Liste writes: > Hello all, Hello, > just for information, I know there is a pre-compiled version of > OpenNebula in your repository, but in the "official" Debian repository > there is only an old version of OpenNebula for Wheezy (3.4) and only > the contextualization package for