"This software will be released in the first quarter of 2005."
Well there's three weeks left. How is the effort going?
-Larry/eagerly anticipating great things
Toon Knapen wrote:
Greg Lindahl wrote:
http://www.openib.org/docs/oib_wkshp_022005/mpi-abi-pathscale-lindahl.pdf
mostly talks about why we need an ABI, who wins and loses as a result
of having one, and the pieces that could be in it. Please give it a
look.
The presentation ignores the issue
I don't care if it even compiles, I would just like to evaluate the design.
-Larry
SiCortex
Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe wrote:
> H
>>> the MPI model assumes you don't have a "shared memory" system..
>>> therefore it is "message passing" oriented, and not designed to
>>> perform optimally on shared memory systems (like SMPs, or numa-CCs).
>>>
>> For many programs with
