Re: [OMPI users] 2 to 1 oversubscription

2009-07-13 Thread JACOB_LIBERMAN
Hi Robert, Hakon Bugge presented a paper on this at ISC09. He found that SMT helped several SPEC MPI benchmarks. (He used Platform MPI, not Open MPI.) He did not oversubscribe, though. He just enabled SMT, which allowed the OS to allocate spare CPU cycles during IO wait, etc. My conclusions

Re: [OMPI users] HPL with OpenMPI: Do I have a memory leak?

2009-05-01 Thread JACOB_LIBERMAN
Hi Gus, For single node runs, don't bother specifying the btl. Openmpi should select the best option. Beyond that, the "80% total RAM" recommendation is misleading. Base your N off the memfree rather than memtotal. IB can reserve quite a bit. Verify your /etc/security/limits.conf limits allo

Re: [OMPI users] Openmpi and processor affinity

2009-06-03 Thread JACOB_LIBERMAN
Hi Iftikhar, For HPL, try writing a bash script that pins processes to their local memory controllers using numactl before kicking off HPL. This is particularly helpful when spawning more than 1 thread per process. The last line of your script should look like "numactl -c $cpu_bind -m $ mem_b

Re: [OMPI users] Openmpi and processor affinity

2009-06-03 Thread JACOB_LIBERMAN
Hi Jeff, Yes, this technique is particularly helpful for multi-threaded and works consistently across the various MPIs I test. Thanks, jacob > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On > Behalf Of Jeff Squyres > Sent: Wednesday, June 0