Dear George,
Thank you for your reply. I understood your point that I
should implement correct communication scheme instead of using eager limit as a
parameter.
However, my intention for relying and taking benefit of eager limit is to avoid
application memory allocation a
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Dear Jeff,
Thank you for the reply.
I am doing pairwise send-recv and not all-to-all since not all the data is
required by all the ranks.
And I am doing blocking send and recv calls since there are multiple iterations
of such
On Mar 26, 2020, at 5:36 AM, Raut, S Biplab wrote:
>
> I am doing pairwise send-recv and not all-to-all since not all the data is
> required by all the ranks.
> And I am doing blocking send and recv calls since there are multiple
> iterations of such message chunks to be sent with synchronizati
An application that rely on MPI eager buffers for correctness or
performance is an incorrect application. Among many other points simply
because MPI implementations without support for eager are legit. Moreover,
these applications also miss the point on performance. Among the overheads
I am not onl
Thank you Jeff and George for your enlightening comments and inputs !!
I will design my application algorithm appropriately.
With Regards,
S. Biplab Raut
From: George Bosilca
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 8:00 PM
To: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Cc: Raut, S Biplab ; Open MPI User's List
Subject:
