Are you running with ulimit -s unlimited?
If not that looks like a out-of-stack crash, which VASP frequently causes.
If you are running with unlimited stack, I could perhaps run that input
case on our VASP build. (Which have a bunch of fixes for bad stack usage
among other things)
On 07/11/2018 1
I’ve recompiled 3.1.1 with —enable-debug —enable-mem-debug, and I still get no
detailed information from the mpi libraries, only VASP (as before):
ldd (at runtime, so I’m fairly sure it’s referring to the right executable and
LD_LIBRARY_PATH) info:
vexec /usr/local/vasp/bin/5.4.4/0test/vasp.gamm
> On Jul 12, 2018, at 8:37 AM, Noam Bernstein
> wrote:
>
> I’m going to try the 3.1.x 20180710 nightly snapshot next.
Same behavior, exactly - segfault, no debugging info beyond the vasp routine
that calls mpi_allreduce.
Do you get core files?
Loading up the core file in a debugger might give us more information.
> On Jul 12, 2018, at 9:35 AM, Noam Bernstein
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 12, 2018, at 8:37 AM, Noam Bernstein
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m going to try the 3.1.x 20180710 nightly snapshot next.
>
> Same be
> On Jul 12, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via users
> wrote:
>
> Do you get core files?
>
> Loading up the core file in a debugger might give us more information.
No, I don’t, despite setting "ulimit -c unlimited”. I’m not sure what’s going
on with that (or the lack of line i
On Jul 12, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Noam Bernstein
wrote:
>
>> Do you get core files?
>>
>> Loading up the core file in a debugger might give us more information.
>
> No, I don’t, despite setting "ulimit -c unlimited”. I’m not sure what’s
> going on with that (or the lack of line info in the sta
> On Jul 12, 2018, at 11:02 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Noam Bernstein
> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you get core files?
>>>
>>> Loading up the core file in a debugger might give us more information.
>>
>> No, I don’t, despite setting "ulimit -c unlimited”
On Jul 12, 2018, at 11:45 AM, Noam Bernstein
wrote:
>
>> E.g., if you "ulimit -c" in your interactive shell and see "unlimited", but
>> if you "ulimit -c" in a launched job and see "0", then the job scheduler is
>> doing that to your environment somewhere.
>
> I am using a scheduler (torque),
> On Jul 12, 2018, at 11:58 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> (You may have already done this; I just want to make sure we're on the same
> sheet of music here…)
I’m not talking about the job script or shell startup files. The actual
“executable” passed to mpirun on the command
Noam and I actually talked on the phone (whtt!?) and worked through this a
bit more.
Oddly, he can generate core files if he runs in /tmp, but not if he runs in an
NFS-mounted directory (!). I haven't seen that before -- if someone knows why
that would happen, I'd love to hear the explanat
10 matches
Mail list logo
